Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 10

606P - Regional lymph nodes (N+ vs N0) in metastatic colorectal cancer

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 10

Topics

Cancer Biology

Tumour Site

Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Emerik Osterlund

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S410-S457. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01935-X

Authors

E. Osterlund1, H. Isoniemi2, H. Sorbye3, P. Pfeiffer4, L. Nunes5, P. Halonen6, A. Uutela7, T. Salminen8, A. Algars9, R. Ristamaki10, R. Kallio11, A. Lamminmäki12, A. Ristimäki13, L. Nieminen14, J. Sundström15, M.J. Mäkinen16, S. Kytölä17, T. Sjöblom5, B. Glimelius1, P.J. Osterlund18

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Immunology, Genetics And Pathology, Uppsala University, 752 37 - Uppsala/SE
  • 2 Transplantation And Liver Surgery Unit, Helsinki University Hospital, HUS-00029 - Helsinki/FI
  • 3 Department Of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 - Bergen/NO
  • 4 Experimental Research In Medical Cancer Therapy, Odense University Hospital, 5000 - Odense/DK
  • 5 Department Of Immunology, Genetics And Pathology, Uppsala University, 75185 - Uppsala/SE
  • 6 Department Of Oncology, Helsinki University Central Hospital (HUCH), 00029 - Helsinki/FI
  • 7 Transplantation And Liver Surgery Unit, Helsinki University Hospital and Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 00290 - Helsinki/FI
  • 8 Department Of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, 33520 - Tampere/FI
  • 9 Department Of Oncology, Turku University Hospital (Tyks), 20521 - Turku/FI
  • 10 Department Of Oncology, Turku University Hospital TYKS, 20521 - Turku/FI
  • 11 Department Of Oncology, Oulu University Hospital, 90220 - Oulu/FI
  • 12 Department Of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital, 70210 - Kuopio/FI
  • 13 Department Of Pathology, Helsinki University Hospital, 00290 - Helsinki/FI
  • 14 Department Of Pathology, Tampere University Hospital/FIMLAB, 33510 - Tampere/FI
  • 15 Department Of Pathology, Turku University Hospital (Tyks), 20521 - Turku/FI
  • 16 Department Of Pathology, Oulu University Hospital, 90220 - Oulu/FI
  • 17 Department Of Genetics, HUCH - Helsinki University Central Hospital, 00029 - Helsinki/FI
  • 18 Department Of Oncology, Tampere and Karolinska University Hospitals, 33520 - Tampere/FI

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 606P

Background

Regional lymph node metastases are negative prognostic factors in localized disease and after liver resection, but little is known in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We studied demographics, treatments, and outcomes for mCRC with (N+) and without (N0) regional lymph node metastases in population-based and real-world settings.

Methods

Patients from three Nordic mCRC cohorts were combined; the population based PRCRC-study, the likewise Uppsala Region cohort and the real-world RAXO study. The dataset included 1764 patients with resected primary tumours, of which 1710 had pathologic N-stage reported. Characteristics and treatments were compared using Chi-square. Overall survival (OS) was estimated with Kaplan-Meier and compared using log-rank.

Results

N+ were seen in 1242 (73%) and N0 in 468 (27%). N+ patients associated with female sex, right-sided primaries, higher tumour grade, synchronous metastases, more metastatic sites, more liver, distant lymph node, and peritoneal metastases, and fewer lung metastases compared with N0 (Table). No differences were seen for ECOG and age >70 years. BRAF-V600E mutations (mt) were more common in N+, as was deficient mismatch repair, whereas RASmt were seen less often.

Table: 606P

N0 N+ p-value
Age (years) 241 51% 689 55% 0.141
>70 227 49% 553 45%
Sex Male 276 59% 662 53% 0.036
Female 192 41% 580 47%
Primary sidedness Right 131 28% 473 39% <0.001
(15 unknown/multiple) Left 334 72% 757 62%
Tumour stage 1-2 87 19% 52 4% <0.001
(11 missing) 3 284 62% 777 63%
4 91 20% 408 33%
Tumour grade Low 359 90% 829 77% <0.001
(23 missing) High 41 10% 254 23%
Presentation of metastases Synchronous 167 36% 682 55% <0.001
Metachronous 301 64% 560 45%
Metastatic sites Liver 285 61% 823 66% 0.038
Lung 154 33% 323 26% 0.005
Distant nodes 62 13% 350 28% <0.001
Peritoneum 73 16% 269 22% 0.005
Mutation groups RAS&BRAFwt 116 31% 311 32% 0.001
(357 not adequately tested) RASmt 224 60% 503 51%
BRAF-V600Emt 34 9% 165 17%

N+ patients had less metastasectomies (31% vs 39%, p=0.001) and more systemic therapy only (51% vs 43 %, p=0.001), with no difference for best supportive care. Median OS was shorter in the N+ vs N0 group (23 vs 34 months, p <0.001); likewise for metastasectomy patients (64 vs 96 months, p=0.001), and systemic therapy only (20 vs 27 months, p=0.001). N+ did worse than N0 with non-liver metastasectomy (77 vs 45 months, p=0.018), with similar trends for synchronous (77 vs 39 months, p=0.060) and metachronous presentation (not reached vs 58 months, p=0.172) subgroups.

Conclusions

Regional lymph node metastases (N+) were associated with several other negative prognostic factors. This resulted in fewer metastasectomies and impaired outcome in all and non-liver metastasectomy and systemic therapy only.

Clinical trial identification

NCT01531595; EudraCT 2011-003137-33.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

The PRCRC-study was supported by The Norwegian, Danish, and Swedish Cancer Societies. Amgen partly supported the NGS analysis performed in patients included in the Uppsala region cohort. The RAXO-study was supported by Finska Läkaresällskapet, Cancer Foundation Finland, Relander’s Foundation , the Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility Area of Tampere, Helsinki and Turku, Tampere University Hospital Funds, the Research Fund of Helsinki University Hospital. The infrastructure with database and study nurses were partly supported by pharmaceutical companies (Amgen unrestricted grant 2012–2020, Eli Lilly 2012–2017, Merck KGaA 2012–2020, Roche Oy 2012–2020, Sanofi 2012–2017 and Servier unrestricted grant 2016–2020). The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study, collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Disclosure

E. Osterlund: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Advisory board: Amgen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, PI's institution: Amgen, Roche, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding, PI's institution: Eli Lilly, Merck, Sanofi; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck, Servier; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche. H. Isoniemi: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Amgen, Servier, Sanofi, Roche, Merck, Eli Lilly and Company; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Servier. H. Sorbye: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Ipsen, SAM Nordic, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AAA; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: Bristol Myers Squibb. P. Pfeiffer: Financial Interests, Local PI: Sanofi-Aventis, Eli Lilly, Nordic Drug, MSD, Celgene, Servier, Roche, AstraZeneca, Taiho, Shire, Isofol, Pierre Fabre, Scandion, GSK, Amgen, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Astellas; Financial Interests, Personal, Local PI: Egetis. P. Halonen: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen. A. Uutela: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Amgen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Roche, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: Servier. T. Salminen: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Roche, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Roche, Sanofi, Servier. A. Algars: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Merck, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board, PI:s institution: Amgen, Eli Lilly; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, PI:s institution: Merck, Sanofi, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Roche; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Servier. R. Ristamaki: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, PI's institution: Amgen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding, PI's institution: Eli Lilly, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Servier; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Merck, Roche, AstraZeneca. R. Kallio: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Roche, Merck, Sanofi, Servier. A. Lamminmäki: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Merck, Roche, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Sanofi, Servier. A. Ristimäki: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Servier. L. Nieminen: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, PI:s institution: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding, PI:s institution: Roche, Sanofi, Servier. J. Sundström: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, PI's institution: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding, PI's institution: Merck, Roche, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Training: Ipsen. M.J. Mäkinen: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Merck, Roche, Servier; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bristol Myers Squibb. S. Kytölä: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, PI's institution: Amgen, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding, PI's institution: Eli Lilly, Merck, Roche, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, Lilly, Amgen, Novartis. B. Glimelius: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen. P.J. Osterlund: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Sobi, Incyte, Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca, Eisai, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Eisai/Ewopharma, Novartis, Roche, Servier, Nordic Drugs, Nutricia, Fresenius Kabi, Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, FIMEA expert testimony: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Incyte; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Roche, Pfizer; Non-Financial Interests, Member: Colores patient advocacy group; Non-Financial Interests, Member, Board member: Finnish cancer society. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.