Abstract 606P
Background
Regional lymph node metastases are negative prognostic factors in localized disease and after liver resection, but little is known in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We studied demographics, treatments, and outcomes for mCRC with (N+) and without (N0) regional lymph node metastases in population-based and real-world settings.
Methods
Patients from three Nordic mCRC cohorts were combined; the population based PRCRC-study, the likewise Uppsala Region cohort and the real-world RAXO study. The dataset included 1764 patients with resected primary tumours, of which 1710 had pathologic N-stage reported. Characteristics and treatments were compared using Chi-square. Overall survival (OS) was estimated with Kaplan-Meier and compared using log-rank.
Results
N+ were seen in 1242 (73%) and N0 in 468 (27%). N+ patients associated with female sex, right-sided primaries, higher tumour grade, synchronous metastases, more metastatic sites, more liver, distant lymph node, and peritoneal metastases, and fewer lung metastases compared with N0 (Table). No differences were seen for ECOG and age >70 years. BRAF-V600E mutations (mt) were more common in N+, as was deficient mismatch repair, whereas RASmt were seen less often.
Table: 606P
N0 | N+ | p-value | ||||
Age (years) | =70 | 241 | 51% | 689 | 55% | 0.141 |
>70 | 227 | 49% | 553 | 45% | ||
Sex | Male | 276 | 59% | 662 | 53% | 0.036 |
Female | 192 | 41% | 580 | 47% | ||
Primary sidedness | Right | 131 | 28% | 473 | 39% | <0.001 |
(15 unknown/multiple) | Left | 334 | 72% | 757 | 62% | |
Tumour stage | 1-2 | 87 | 19% | 52 | 4% | <0.001 |
(11 missing) | 3 | 284 | 62% | 777 | 63% | |
4 | 91 | 20% | 408 | 33% | ||
Tumour grade | Low | 359 | 90% | 829 | 77% | <0.001 |
(23 missing) | High | 41 | 10% | 254 | 23% | |
Presentation of metastases | Synchronous | 167 | 36% | 682 | 55% | <0.001 |
Metachronous | 301 | 64% | 560 | 45% | ||
Metastatic sites | Liver | 285 | 61% | 823 | 66% | 0.038 |
Lung | 154 | 33% | 323 | 26% | 0.005 | |
Distant nodes | 62 | 13% | 350 | 28% | <0.001 | |
Peritoneum | 73 | 16% | 269 | 22% | 0.005 | |
Mutation groups | RAS&BRAFwt | 116 | 31% | 311 | 32% | 0.001 |
(357 not adequately tested) | RASmt | 224 | 60% | 503 | 51% | |
BRAF-V600Emt | 34 | 9% | 165 | 17% |
N+ patients had less metastasectomies (31% vs 39%, p=0.001) and more systemic therapy only (51% vs 43 %, p=0.001), with no difference for best supportive care. Median OS was shorter in the N+ vs N0 group (23 vs 34 months, p <0.001); likewise for metastasectomy patients (64 vs 96 months, p=0.001), and systemic therapy only (20 vs 27 months, p=0.001). N+ did worse than N0 with non-liver metastasectomy (77 vs 45 months, p=0.018), with similar trends for synchronous (77 vs 39 months, p=0.060) and metachronous presentation (not reached vs 58 months, p=0.172) subgroups.
Conclusions
Regional lymph node metastases (N+) were associated with several other negative prognostic factors. This resulted in fewer metastasectomies and impaired outcome in all and non-liver metastasectomy and systemic therapy only.
Clinical trial identification
NCT01531595; EudraCT 2011-003137-33.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
The PRCRC-study was supported by The Norwegian, Danish, and Swedish Cancer Societies. Amgen partly supported the NGS analysis performed in patients included in the Uppsala region cohort. The RAXO-study was supported by Finska Läkaresällskapet, Cancer Foundation Finland, Relander’s Foundation , the Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility Area of Tampere, Helsinki and Turku, Tampere University Hospital Funds, the Research Fund of Helsinki University Hospital. The infrastructure with database and study nurses were partly supported by pharmaceutical companies (Amgen unrestricted grant 2012–2020, Eli Lilly 2012–2017, Merck KGaA 2012–2020, Roche Oy 2012–2020, Sanofi 2012–2017 and Servier unrestricted grant 2016–2020). The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study, collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Disclosure
E. Osterlund: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Advisory board: Amgen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, PI's institution: Amgen, Roche, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding, PI's institution: Eli Lilly, Merck, Sanofi; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck, Servier; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche. H. Isoniemi: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Amgen, Servier, Sanofi, Roche, Merck, Eli Lilly and Company; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Servier. H. Sorbye: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Ipsen, SAM Nordic, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AAA; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: Bristol Myers Squibb. P. Pfeiffer: Financial Interests, Local PI: Sanofi-Aventis, Eli Lilly, Nordic Drug, MSD, Celgene, Servier, Roche, AstraZeneca, Taiho, Shire, Isofol, Pierre Fabre, Scandion, GSK, Amgen, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Astellas; Financial Interests, Personal, Local PI: Egetis. P. Halonen: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen. A. Uutela: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Amgen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Roche, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: Servier. T. Salminen: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Roche, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Roche, Sanofi, Servier. A. Algars: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Merck, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board, PI:s institution: Amgen, Eli Lilly; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, PI:s institution: Merck, Sanofi, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Roche; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Servier. R. Ristamaki: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, PI's institution: Amgen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding, PI's institution: Eli Lilly, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Servier; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Merck, Roche, AstraZeneca. R. Kallio: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Roche, Merck, Sanofi, Servier. A. Lamminmäki: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Merck, Roche, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Sanofi, Servier. A. Ristimäki: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Servier. L. Nieminen: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, PI:s institution: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding, PI:s institution: Roche, Sanofi, Servier. J. Sundström: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, PI's institution: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding, PI's institution: Merck, Roche, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Training: Ipsen. M.J. Mäkinen: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Merck, Roche, Servier; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bristol Myers Squibb. S. Kytölä: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, PI's institution: Amgen, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding, PI's institution: Eli Lilly, Merck, Roche, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, Lilly, Amgen, Novartis. B. Glimelius: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen. P.J. Osterlund: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Sobi, Incyte, Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca, Eisai, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Eisai/Ewopharma, Novartis, Roche, Servier, Nordic Drugs, Nutricia, Fresenius Kabi, Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, FIMEA expert testimony: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Incyte; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Roche, Pfizer; Non-Financial Interests, Member: Colores patient advocacy group; Non-Financial Interests, Member, Board member: Finnish cancer society. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
622P - Evaluation of the metastatic colorectal cancer score (mCCS) in predicting outcome for patients with RAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with first-line (1L) panitumumab (PAN) plus FOLFIRI/FOLFOX: Updated interim results of the non-interventional study VALIDATE
Presenter: Marcel Reiser
Session: Poster session 10
623P - VIC regimen (vemurafenib/irinotecan/cetuximab) versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for BRAF V600E-mutated advanced colorectal cancer
Presenter: Yijiao Chen
Session: Poster session 10
624P - Tolerability and safety of vemurafenib, cetuximab combined with camrelizumab for BRAF V600E-mutated /MSS metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Meng Qiu
Session: Poster session 10
625P - Efficacy and safety of the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: An AGEO real-world multicentre study
Presenter: Claire Gallois
Session: Poster session 10
626P - Mucinous differentiation (MD) as predictor of response in BRAF-V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) combinations
Presenter: Francisco Javier Ros Montana
Session: Poster session 10