Abstract 970P
Background
Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB) is one of the commonly used 1st-line regimen for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after its superior outcomes compared to sorafenib in IMbrave150 trial. However, the optimal treatment options for pts with HCC who progressed on the 1st-line AB remain unclear. This real-world study aims to compare efficacy of different systemic 2nd-line treatments in pts with HCC who progressed on 1st-line AB.
Methods
This multi-national, multi-institutional, retrospective study included pts with advanced HCC from 22 centers in 5 Asia-Pacific countries (Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, Thailand, and Taiwan) who were treated with the 1st-line AB and stopped due to any reasons, including disease progression or toxicity. The endpoints of this study included PFS or OS per 2nd-line regimen.
Results
From June 2016 to January 2023, a total of 673 pts with HCC were treated with 1st-line AB, out of which 369 pts (54.8%) started the subsequent treatment. For the main analysis population treated with 2nd-line systemic therapy (n=340), 18.5% (n=63) of pts were Child-Pugh class B. Sorafenib and lenvatinib were the most commonly used 2nd-line regimen (57.1% and 24.5%, respectively). Overall, the median PFS and OS were of 2.9 (95%CI 2.5-3.1) and 8.0 months (95%CI 7.2-9.3), respectively. Lenvatinib showed longer PFS than sorafenib (3.7 vs 2.1 months, P<0.0001), but no significant difference in OS (8 vs 7.2 months, P=0.094). Pts treated with various combinations of TKI plus ICI (n=32, 9.4%) showed PFS and OS of 6.4 (95%CI: 3.7-NR) and 18.9 (95%CI: 9.8-NR) months, respectively. Additional analyses showed that pts with shorter PFS of AB had shorter 2nd-line PFS compared to patients who achieved longer 1st-line PFS. 54.9% (161/293) of pts were treated with subsequent systemic treatment after progression on 2nd-line therapy.
Conclusions
In pts with HCC progressed on the 1st-line AB, sorafenib and lenvatinib were the most commonly used 2nd-line regimen with comparable OS. The combination of 2nd-line TKI plus ICI showed promising results, suggesting a potential role for continuing ICIs beyond progression. Further updated data with more pts will be presented.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
946P - Sintilimab plus lenvatinib as conversion therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective, non-randomized, open-label, phase II, expansion cohort study
Presenter: Shichun Lu
Session: Poster session 18
947P - The efficacy and safety of cadonilimab combined with lenvatinib for first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase Ib/II clinical trial
Presenter: Li Bai
Session: Poster session 18
949P - Regorafenib combined with immunotherapy versus regorafenib as second-line therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter real-world study
Presenter: Bin-Kui Li
Session: Poster session 18
952P - Efficacy and safety of a PRospective, Observational trial of Lenvatinib cOmbined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as initial treatment for advaNced staGe hepatocellular carcinoma (PROLONG): A multicenter, single-armed, real-world study
Presenter: Guoliang Shao
Session: Poster session 18
953P - Tislelizumab plus regorafenib as second-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): A single-arm, phase II trial
Presenter: Zhongchao Li
Session: Poster session 18
954P - Radiotherapy combined with tislelizumab plus anlotinib as first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: A single arm, phase II clinical trial
Presenter: Guishu wu
Session: Poster session 18
955P - IMMUNIB trial (AIO-HEP-0218/ass): A single-arm phase II study evaluating safety and efficacy of immunotherapy with nivolumab in combination with lenvatinib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Arndt Vogel
Session: Poster session 18