Abstract 970P
Background
Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB) is one of the commonly used 1st-line regimen for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after its superior outcomes compared to sorafenib in IMbrave150 trial. However, the optimal treatment options for pts with HCC who progressed on the 1st-line AB remain unclear. This real-world study aims to compare efficacy of different systemic 2nd-line treatments in pts with HCC who progressed on 1st-line AB.
Methods
This multi-national, multi-institutional, retrospective study included pts with advanced HCC from 22 centers in 5 Asia-Pacific countries (Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, Thailand, and Taiwan) who were treated with the 1st-line AB and stopped due to any reasons, including disease progression or toxicity. The endpoints of this study included PFS or OS per 2nd-line regimen.
Results
From June 2016 to January 2023, a total of 673 pts with HCC were treated with 1st-line AB, out of which 369 pts (54.8%) started the subsequent treatment. For the main analysis population treated with 2nd-line systemic therapy (n=340), 18.5% (n=63) of pts were Child-Pugh class B. Sorafenib and lenvatinib were the most commonly used 2nd-line regimen (57.1% and 24.5%, respectively). Overall, the median PFS and OS were of 2.9 (95%CI 2.5-3.1) and 8.0 months (95%CI 7.2-9.3), respectively. Lenvatinib showed longer PFS than sorafenib (3.7 vs 2.1 months, P<0.0001), but no significant difference in OS (8 vs 7.2 months, P=0.094). Pts treated with various combinations of TKI plus ICI (n=32, 9.4%) showed PFS and OS of 6.4 (95%CI: 3.7-NR) and 18.9 (95%CI: 9.8-NR) months, respectively. Additional analyses showed that pts with shorter PFS of AB had shorter 2nd-line PFS compared to patients who achieved longer 1st-line PFS. 54.9% (161/293) of pts were treated with subsequent systemic treatment after progression on 2nd-line therapy.
Conclusions
In pts with HCC progressed on the 1st-line AB, sorafenib and lenvatinib were the most commonly used 2nd-line regimen with comparable OS. The combination of 2nd-line TKI plus ICI showed promising results, suggesting a potential role for continuing ICIs beyond progression. Further updated data with more pts will be presented.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
832P - Characterisation of EXS73565: A potent and selective MALT1 inhibitor with low drug-drug interaction risk and potential in lymphoma
Presenter: Major Gooyit
Session: Poster session 18
833P - New targets for adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL): A map for ATLL immunotherapy
Presenter: Zahra Rezaei Borojerdi
Session: Poster session 18
834P - Phase II clinical study of VR-CAP regimen for first-line treatment of marginal zone lymphoma
Presenter: Junfeng Chu
Session: Poster session 18
835P - A safe and effective immunochemotherapy with oral sobuzoxane and etoposide for untreated diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients aged 80 and over
Presenter: Kaname Miyashita
Session: Poster session 18
838P - Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and epcoritamab (epcor) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) after at least two prior systemic therapies (3L+)
Presenter: Olalekan Oluwole
Session: Poster session 18
840P - Genomic landscape, immune characteristics and prognostic mutation signature of extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type in China
Presenter: Yue Chai
Session: Poster session 18
841P - Ki67-revised risk index to risk-stratify patients with extra-nodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma
Presenter: Shuo Li
Session: Poster session 18