Abstract 610P
Background
Individual patient outcomes may substantially differ from average treatment effects obtained in randomised controlled trials (RCT) due to patient heterogeneity. We aimed to predict which patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) will benefit from first-line FOLFOXIRI versus FOLFOX/FOLFIRI, both plus bevacizumab.
Methods
Data from 639 patients (434 deaths) included in the phase III TRIBE2 RCT were used for developing a Cox regression model based on prespecified clinical, molecular, and laboratory variables for predicting 2-year mortality. Data from 232 patients (199 deaths) included in the phase II CHARTA RCT were used for external validation and heterogeneity in treatment effects analysis. Missing data was handled by multiple imputation. The C-index and calibration plots were used for performance assessment. C-for-benefit was calculated to assess evidence for treatment heterogeneity. The hazard ratio and absolute risk reduction were plotted as a function of the predicted mortality risk to explore treatment heterogeneity.
Results
In TRIBE2, the C-index was 0.68 (95%CI 0.65 – 0.71). At external validation, the C-index was 0.70 (95%CI 0.64 – 0.75), and the calibration plot indicated slight underestimation of mortality in high-risk patients. The c-for-benefit was 0.56 (95%CI 0.47 – 0.65). On the relative scale, there was no evidence of treatment heterogeneity (p for interaction = 0.16). On the absolute scale, the risk reduction in the lowest risk to highest risk quarter was 18% (95%CI 0 – 37%), 24% (95%CI 2 – 45%), -4% (95%CI -3 – 18%) and 0% (95%CI -16 – 16%), respectively.
Conclusions
Although our data suggest that patients with a low mortality risk have greater benefit of intensified treatment on an absolute scale, the predictions lack sufficient certainty to be used in clinical practice for individualised decision making. Larger samples are required to draw final conclusions on whether benefit from FOLFOXIRI could be predicted in patients with mCRC.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02339116, NCT01321957.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
J. J. Kwakman.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
C. Cremolini: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, MSD, Amgen, Pierre Fabre, Nordic Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bayer, Servier, Merck Serono; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Roche, Bayer, Servier, Merck. H.J.E. Schmoll: Financial Interests, Other, Travel, accommodations, and expenses: Roche; Financial Interests, Research Funding: Roche; Financial Interests, , Advisory Board: Roche. D. Rossini: Financial Interests, Speaker’s Bureau: MSD. M. Koopman: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board, advisory board and speaker: Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: MSD, Bayer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board, Advisory Board, speaker: Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Institutional, Trial Chair: Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Servier, Roche, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Personal Genomics Diagnostics, Sirtex, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Pierre Fabre, Amgen, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Merck, Servier, Bristol Myers Squibb; Non-Financial Interests, Leadership Role, vice-chair of DCCG: Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role, Member of KWF scientific board: KWF; Non-Financial Interests, Other, ESMO faculty member for the Gastro-Intestinal Tumours – colorectal cancer: ESMO; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role, expert member of committee “regie op registers dure geneesmiddelen” ZINNL: ZiNNL; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role, CRC expert on Kanker.nl platform for answering online CRC questions of CRC (non) patients: Patient respresentative organisation (Kanker.nl); Non-Financial Interests, Leadership Role, chair of RWD & DH working group: ESMO; Other, PI of the Dutch Prospective Colorectal Cancer Cohort study: PLCRC project. C.J.A. Punt: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Nordic Group BV. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
590P - Assessment of circulating tumor (ct)DNA in patients (pts) with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) pts treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT)
Presenter: Chiara Molinari
Session: Poster session 10
592P - The role of early change in circulating tumor DNA as a potential predictor of response to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Jinjia Chang
Session: Poster session 10
594P - The efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy for RAS mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with RAS mutation negative in circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) after 1st- or 2nd-line chemotherapy
Presenter: Naoki Izawa
Session: Poster session 10
595P - The DUREC trial: Durvalumab plus total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer - a multicenter, single-arm, phase II study (GEMCAD-1703)
Presenter: Jaume Capdevila Castillon
Session: Poster session 10
597P - Surgical quality for patients (pts) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): PROSPECT (NCCTG N1048, alliance)
Presenter: Martin Weiser
Session: Poster session 10
598P - Influence of the early stoma closure after low rectal cancer resection on completeness of adjuvant chemotherapy (CoCStom): A randomized, controlled multicentre trial of the AIO (AIO KRK 0113)
Presenter: Flavius Sandra-Petrescu
Session: Poster session 10
599P - R-IMMUNE: A phase Ib/II study to evaluate safety and efficacy of atezolizumab combined with radio-chemotherapy in a preoperative setting for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC)
Presenter: Javier Carrasco
Session: Poster session 10