Abstract 610P
Background
Individual patient outcomes may substantially differ from average treatment effects obtained in randomised controlled trials (RCT) due to patient heterogeneity. We aimed to predict which patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) will benefit from first-line FOLFOXIRI versus FOLFOX/FOLFIRI, both plus bevacizumab.
Methods
Data from 639 patients (434 deaths) included in the phase III TRIBE2 RCT were used for developing a Cox regression model based on prespecified clinical, molecular, and laboratory variables for predicting 2-year mortality. Data from 232 patients (199 deaths) included in the phase II CHARTA RCT were used for external validation and heterogeneity in treatment effects analysis. Missing data was handled by multiple imputation. The C-index and calibration plots were used for performance assessment. C-for-benefit was calculated to assess evidence for treatment heterogeneity. The hazard ratio and absolute risk reduction were plotted as a function of the predicted mortality risk to explore treatment heterogeneity.
Results
In TRIBE2, the C-index was 0.68 (95%CI 0.65 – 0.71). At external validation, the C-index was 0.70 (95%CI 0.64 – 0.75), and the calibration plot indicated slight underestimation of mortality in high-risk patients. The c-for-benefit was 0.56 (95%CI 0.47 – 0.65). On the relative scale, there was no evidence of treatment heterogeneity (p for interaction = 0.16). On the absolute scale, the risk reduction in the lowest risk to highest risk quarter was 18% (95%CI 0 – 37%), 24% (95%CI 2 – 45%), -4% (95%CI -3 – 18%) and 0% (95%CI -16 – 16%), respectively.
Conclusions
Although our data suggest that patients with a low mortality risk have greater benefit of intensified treatment on an absolute scale, the predictions lack sufficient certainty to be used in clinical practice for individualised decision making. Larger samples are required to draw final conclusions on whether benefit from FOLFOXIRI could be predicted in patients with mCRC.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02339116, NCT01321957.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
J. J. Kwakman.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
C. Cremolini: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, MSD, Amgen, Pierre Fabre, Nordic Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bayer, Servier, Merck Serono; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Roche, Bayer, Servier, Merck. H.J.E. Schmoll: Financial Interests, Other, Travel, accommodations, and expenses: Roche; Financial Interests, Research Funding: Roche; Financial Interests, , Advisory Board: Roche. D. Rossini: Financial Interests, Speaker’s Bureau: MSD. M. Koopman: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board, advisory board and speaker: Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: MSD, Bayer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board, Advisory Board, speaker: Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Institutional, Trial Chair: Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Servier, Roche, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Personal Genomics Diagnostics, Sirtex, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Pierre Fabre, Amgen, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Merck, Servier, Bristol Myers Squibb; Non-Financial Interests, Leadership Role, vice-chair of DCCG: Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role, Member of KWF scientific board: KWF; Non-Financial Interests, Other, ESMO faculty member for the Gastro-Intestinal Tumours – colorectal cancer: ESMO; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role, expert member of committee “regie op registers dure geneesmiddelen” ZINNL: ZiNNL; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role, CRC expert on Kanker.nl platform for answering online CRC questions of CRC (non) patients: Patient respresentative organisation (Kanker.nl); Non-Financial Interests, Leadership Role, chair of RWD & DH working group: ESMO; Other, PI of the Dutch Prospective Colorectal Cancer Cohort study: PLCRC project. C.J.A. Punt: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Nordic Group BV. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
622P - Evaluation of the metastatic colorectal cancer score (mCCS) in predicting outcome for patients with RAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with first-line (1L) panitumumab (PAN) plus FOLFIRI/FOLFOX: Updated interim results of the non-interventional study VALIDATE
Presenter: Marcel Reiser
Session: Poster session 10
623P - VIC regimen (vemurafenib/irinotecan/cetuximab) versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for BRAF V600E-mutated advanced colorectal cancer
Presenter: Yijiao Chen
Session: Poster session 10
624P - Tolerability and safety of vemurafenib, cetuximab combined with camrelizumab for BRAF V600E-mutated /MSS metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Meng Qiu
Session: Poster session 10
625P - Efficacy and safety of the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: An AGEO real-world multicentre study
Presenter: Claire Gallois
Session: Poster session 10
626P - Mucinous differentiation (MD) as predictor of response in BRAF-V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) combinations
Presenter: Francisco Javier Ros Montana
Session: Poster session 10