Abstract 610P
Background
Individual patient outcomes may substantially differ from average treatment effects obtained in randomised controlled trials (RCT) due to patient heterogeneity. We aimed to predict which patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) will benefit from first-line FOLFOXIRI versus FOLFOX/FOLFIRI, both plus bevacizumab.
Methods
Data from 639 patients (434 deaths) included in the phase III TRIBE2 RCT were used for developing a Cox regression model based on prespecified clinical, molecular, and laboratory variables for predicting 2-year mortality. Data from 232 patients (199 deaths) included in the phase II CHARTA RCT were used for external validation and heterogeneity in treatment effects analysis. Missing data was handled by multiple imputation. The C-index and calibration plots were used for performance assessment. C-for-benefit was calculated to assess evidence for treatment heterogeneity. The hazard ratio and absolute risk reduction were plotted as a function of the predicted mortality risk to explore treatment heterogeneity.
Results
In TRIBE2, the C-index was 0.68 (95%CI 0.65 – 0.71). At external validation, the C-index was 0.70 (95%CI 0.64 – 0.75), and the calibration plot indicated slight underestimation of mortality in high-risk patients. The c-for-benefit was 0.56 (95%CI 0.47 – 0.65). On the relative scale, there was no evidence of treatment heterogeneity (p for interaction = 0.16). On the absolute scale, the risk reduction in the lowest risk to highest risk quarter was 18% (95%CI 0 – 37%), 24% (95%CI 2 – 45%), -4% (95%CI -3 – 18%) and 0% (95%CI -16 – 16%), respectively.
Conclusions
Although our data suggest that patients with a low mortality risk have greater benefit of intensified treatment on an absolute scale, the predictions lack sufficient certainty to be used in clinical practice for individualised decision making. Larger samples are required to draw final conclusions on whether benefit from FOLFOXIRI could be predicted in patients with mCRC.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02339116, NCT01321957.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
J. J. Kwakman.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
C. Cremolini: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, MSD, Amgen, Pierre Fabre, Nordic Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bayer, Servier, Merck Serono; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Roche, Bayer, Servier, Merck. H.J.E. Schmoll: Financial Interests, Other, Travel, accommodations, and expenses: Roche; Financial Interests, Research Funding: Roche; Financial Interests, , Advisory Board: Roche. D. Rossini: Financial Interests, Speaker’s Bureau: MSD. M. Koopman: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board, advisory board and speaker: Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: MSD, Bayer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board, Advisory Board, speaker: Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Institutional, Trial Chair: Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Servier, Roche, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Personal Genomics Diagnostics, Sirtex, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Pierre Fabre, Amgen, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Merck, Servier, Bristol Myers Squibb; Non-Financial Interests, Leadership Role, vice-chair of DCCG: Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role, Member of KWF scientific board: KWF; Non-Financial Interests, Other, ESMO faculty member for the Gastro-Intestinal Tumours – colorectal cancer: ESMO; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role, expert member of committee “regie op registers dure geneesmiddelen” ZINNL: ZiNNL; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role, CRC expert on Kanker.nl platform for answering online CRC questions of CRC (non) patients: Patient respresentative organisation (Kanker.nl); Non-Financial Interests, Leadership Role, chair of RWD & DH working group: ESMO; Other, PI of the Dutch Prospective Colorectal Cancer Cohort study: PLCRC project. C.J.A. Punt: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Nordic Group BV. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
528P - Progression risk after pregnancy in patients with glioma
Presenter: Annette Leibetseder
Session: Poster session 10
529P - Post-marketing surveillance data from patients ≥70 years of age with central nervous system malignancies treated with Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy between 2011–2022
Presenter: Wenyin Shi
Session: Poster session 10
530P - Ultra low bevacizumab (BEVULTRA-100) as a novel approach in symptomatic management of high grade glioma: Can minimal dose make a difference?
Presenter: P ANURADHA
Session: Poster session 10
531P - Tumor treating fields therapy for glioblastoma: Identifying needs and satisfaction of new and long-term users
Presenter: Eleni T. Batzianouli
Session: Poster session 10
532P - Nitric oxide is a target by a combo-drug for glioblastoma treatment
Presenter: Manish Tripathi
Session: Poster session 10
533P - Oligodendrogliomas: What is the impact after the introduction of the WHO molecular classification?
Presenter: Maria Angeles Vaz Salgado
Session: Poster session 10
534P - Glioblastoma treatment in patients older than 60 years: Hypofractionated radiotherapy and temozolomide versus conventional radiotherapy and temozolomide
Presenter: Teresa Pacheco
Session: Poster session 10
535P - Hypofractionated radiotherapy in fit elderly patients with glioblastoma: Relevant or detrimental?
Presenter: Carla Martín Abreu
Session: Poster session 10
536P - Safety and efficacy of silibinin in patients with brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS): The SUSTAIN trial
Presenter: Niccolò Bertini
Session: Poster session 10
537P - S100A9 serum levels are associated with survival prognosis in patients with brain metastases
Presenter: Ariane Steindl
Session: Poster session 10