Abstract 184P
Background
Specific shared HLA Class 1 alleles have been linked to the response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). In this study, we aimed to identify the HLA-A subtypes associated with maximum benefit from ICB.
Methods
We compiled a prospectively maintained clinical dataset of patients who underwent CLIA-approved germline HLA status testing as part of various advanced immune and cell therapy trials undertaken at the Christie NHS Foundation Trust. The probability of overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and their associations with the HLA-A alleles were tested with Cox regression analysis.
Results
A total of 285 patients from 11 immune and cell therapy clinical trials were eligible for final analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 57 years (range: 19 – 82). The tumor categories were NSCLC (n=93), melanoma (n=60), and other cancers (n= 123). We identified 15 HLA-A subtypes, the most common alleles being HLA-A02 (42.2%), HLA-A01 (35.4%), and HLA-A03 (26.0%). A total of 145 patients received ICB either as first-line (56.5%) or as second or later-line (43.5%). Of these, 136 patients had evaluable clinical response status. 24.2% were positive for HLA-A02:01 and were eligible for screening for our HLA-specific trials. Patients with the HLA-A01 and HLA-A30 subtypes were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of clinical response to ICB (odds ratio = 2.58, 95%CI: 1.20 – 5.62, p = 0.017 and 1.80, 95% CI: 1.58-2.18, p= 0.011, respectively). In the NSCLC subgroup, patients with HLA-A01 subtypes were significantly associated with better OS (hazard ratio (HR): 0.42, 95%CI: 0.22-0.81, p= 0.010); meanwhile, HLA-A02 was associated with worse OS (HR: 1.95, 95%CI: 1.09-3.49, p= 0.024). In the other cancers subgroup, HLA-A11 and A24 were associated with better OS (HR: 0.20, 95%CI: 0.05-0.85, p= 0.030 and HR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.10-0.89, p= 0.029, respectively).
Conclusions
HLA-A status predicted clinical outcomes of patients receiving ICB. HLA genotyping could be incorporated early into the diagnostic work-up of patients with solid cancers as a predictive and selective biomarker.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
144P - Artificial intelligence supported treatment decisions for precision oncology
Presenter: Damian Rieke
Session: Poster session 01
145P - Identification of biomarkers of survival across multiple cancer types using eXplainable artificial intelligence
Presenter: Francesca Angileri
Session: Poster session 01
147P - Non-small cell lung cancer: Artificial intelligence enables the identification of survival signatures complementary to an Immunologically active gene expression signature involving previous therapies
Presenter: Pierre Saintigny
Session: Poster session 01
149P - Assessing the effect of single dose trastuzumab and pertuzumab (HP) on biological changes and pathological complete response (pCR) in ERBB2+ Breast Cancer: Results from the neoadjuvant BionHER study
Presenter: Nadia Gomez Serra
Session: Poster session 01
150P - Validation of a genomic assay in early-stage HER2+ breast cancer (BC) treated with trastuzumab and pertuzumab (HP): A correlative analysis from PHERGain phase II trial
Presenter: Antonio Llombart Cussac
Session: Poster session 01
152P - Efficacy of olaparib in advanced cancers with germline or somatic tumor mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 and ATM: A Belgian precision tumor-agnostic phase II study
Presenter: Sofie Joris
Session: Poster session 01
153P - Descriptive analysis of the location of point mutations in BRCA and the risk of breast or ovarian cancer diagnosis
Presenter: Pablo Torres-Mozas
Session: Poster session 01
154P - Highly sensitive serum volatolomic biomarkers for pancreatic cancer diagnosis and prognosis
Presenter: Alfredo Martínez
Session: Poster session 01