Abstract 184P
Background
Specific shared HLA Class 1 alleles have been linked to the response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). In this study, we aimed to identify the HLA-A subtypes associated with maximum benefit from ICB.
Methods
We compiled a prospectively maintained clinical dataset of patients who underwent CLIA-approved germline HLA status testing as part of various advanced immune and cell therapy trials undertaken at the Christie NHS Foundation Trust. The probability of overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and their associations with the HLA-A alleles were tested with Cox regression analysis.
Results
A total of 285 patients from 11 immune and cell therapy clinical trials were eligible for final analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 57 years (range: 19 – 82). The tumor categories were NSCLC (n=93), melanoma (n=60), and other cancers (n= 123). We identified 15 HLA-A subtypes, the most common alleles being HLA-A02 (42.2%), HLA-A01 (35.4%), and HLA-A03 (26.0%). A total of 145 patients received ICB either as first-line (56.5%) or as second or later-line (43.5%). Of these, 136 patients had evaluable clinical response status. 24.2% were positive for HLA-A02:01 and were eligible for screening for our HLA-specific trials. Patients with the HLA-A01 and HLA-A30 subtypes were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of clinical response to ICB (odds ratio = 2.58, 95%CI: 1.20 – 5.62, p = 0.017 and 1.80, 95% CI: 1.58-2.18, p= 0.011, respectively). In the NSCLC subgroup, patients with HLA-A01 subtypes were significantly associated with better OS (hazard ratio (HR): 0.42, 95%CI: 0.22-0.81, p= 0.010); meanwhile, HLA-A02 was associated with worse OS (HR: 1.95, 95%CI: 1.09-3.49, p= 0.024). In the other cancers subgroup, HLA-A11 and A24 were associated with better OS (HR: 0.20, 95%CI: 0.05-0.85, p= 0.030 and HR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.10-0.89, p= 0.029, respectively).
Conclusions
HLA-A status predicted clinical outcomes of patients receiving ICB. HLA genotyping could be incorporated early into the diagnostic work-up of patients with solid cancers as a predictive and selective biomarker.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
227P - Biomarkers for novel NK checkpoint inhibitor anti LLT1 antibody, ZM008: Patient transcriptome analysis
Presenter: M. S. Madhusudhan
Session: Poster session 01
228P - Biomarker discovery via meta-analysis of immunotherapy clinical trials in cancer
Presenter: Benjamin Haibe-Kains
Session: Poster session 01
230P - Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) co-alteration (co-alt) landscape and its impact on erdafitinib (erda) response in the phase II open-label, single-arm RAGNAR trial
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster session 01
231P - Time to deterioration of quality of life as a surrogate of OS: A trial-level surrogacy analysis
Presenter: Adel Shahnam
Session: Poster session 01
232P - Identification of ‘secondary’ germline cancer predisposition variants from somatic tumour testing: Should we evolve towards universal screening?
Presenter: Alejandro Gallego Martinez
Session: Poster session 01