Abstract 191P
Background
Biomarkers are fundamental to oncology, closely tying this practice to that of laboratory medicine. Results are required to be accurate, timely, comprehensive, and comprehendible. External proficiency testing is a key tool in maintaining quality. Traditional schemes test analytic accuracy. Here, we demonstrate the feasibility and utility of a novel end-to-end proficiency testing exercise examining the entire process of biomarker testing.
Methods
Challenge specimens were made using resected colon cancer tissue, each paired with a clinical vignette and distributed to participating labs. Participants were asked to provide all molecular testing required, which could include pre-analytic preparation, immunohistochemistry, gene sequencing, or other methodologies, and to draft and return a final report for each case upon completion. Reports were redistributed to an assessor team including oncologists, who chose therapy based on each lab’s biomarker report. Finally, participants were graded based on their ability to guide oncologists to the most appropriate treatment. Gold standard treatments for each case were decided by assessors prior to the exercise, based on reference results and clinical vignettes.
Results
Eight laboratories participated. Three laboratories were found to have suboptimal results, two leading oncologists to incorrect therapeutic prescriptions (Table) and one withdrawn. Turnaround time ranged from 6-86 days (median 24).
Table: 191P
Resulting number of medical oncologist assessors prescribing the optimal treatment choice based on reported results
Lab ID | ||||||||
Sample ID | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Gold Standard Treatment |
1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor |
2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | Anti-EGFR mAb |
3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | BRAF Inhibitor + Anti-EGFR mAb |
Turnaround Time (Days) | 24 | 63 | 86 | 20 | 29 | 21 | 6 | 14 Days |
Conclusions
This is the first report of end-to-end proficiency testing, providing valuable insights into biomarker quality beyond analytic accuracy, including specimen management, communication, and turnaround time. Here, significant quality gaps were identified, generating opportunities for improvement. This paradigm shift in quality assurance to focus on the complete specimen journey is a promising tool in assessing and improving modern cancer care.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Canadian Pathology Quality Assurance - Assurance qualité canadienne en pathologie (CPQA-AQCP).
Funding
Canadian Pathology Quality Assurance - Assurance Qualité en Pathologie Canadienne (CPQA-AQPC) with funding from Pfizer.
Disclosure
M.D. Carter: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Honoraria: Amgen, Bayer, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Incyte. S. Dudani: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Board: Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Ipsen, Merck, Pfizer, Taiho; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Honoraria: AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Merck, Pfizer. J.M. Loree: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Consulting: Ipsen, Novartis, Amgen, SAGA Diagnostics, Taiho; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Grant: Foundation Medicine, Amgen, Ipsen, Personalis. S. Snow: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Advisory Boards/Consulting: Amgen, Bayer, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Janssen, Knight, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Taiho, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Member of Board of Directors: Lung Cancer Canada; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Research Trials (Institutional Funding): Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi. S. Yip: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Board: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Incyte, Pfizer, Roche. B.S. Sheffield: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Consulting/Advisory Boards/Honoraria/Research Support: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biocartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cell Marque, Elevation Oncology, Eli Lily, EMD Serono, Incyte, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, ThermoFisher, Turning Point Therapeutics. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
175P - Radiomic biomarker of vessel tortuosity for monitoring treatment change: Preliminary findings in prospective evaluation of ECOG-ACRIN EA5163
Presenter: Pushkar Mutha
Session: Poster session 01
176P - Enhancing immunotherapy response prediction via multimodal integration of radiology and pathology deep learning models
Presenter: Marta Ligero
Session: Poster session 01
177P - Revealing differences in radiosensitivity of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)through single-cell sequencing data
Presenter: Peimeng You
Session: Poster session 01
178P - Explainable radiomics, machine and deep learning models to predict immune-checkpoint inhibitor treatment efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients
Presenter: Leonardo Provenzano
Session: Poster session 01
179P - Molecular tumor board directed treatment for patients with advanced stage solid tumors: A case-control study
Presenter: Dhruv Bansal
Session: Poster session 01
180P - An HLA-diet-oriented system unveiling organ-specific occurrence of multiple primary cancers (MPC) with prevention strategy: A large cohort study of 47,550 cancer patients
Presenter: Zixuan Rong
Session: Poster session 01
181P - GeNeo: Agnostic comprehensive genomic profiling versus limited panel organ-directed next-generation sequencing within the Belgian PRECISION initiative
Presenter: Philippe Aftimos
Session: Poster session 01
182P - ALK fusion detection by RNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) compared to DNA in a large, real-world non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) dataset
Presenter: Wade Iams
Session: Poster session 01
183P - Frequency of actionable fusions in 7,735 patients with solid tumors
Presenter: Kevin McDonnell
Session: Poster session 01
184P - Patient-specific HLA-I genotypes predict response to immune checkpoint blockade
Presenter: Kyrillus Shohdy
Session: Poster session 01