Abstract 2047P
Background
Despite significant advances in prevention and treatment, febrile neutropenia (FN) remains a common and serious complication of chemotherapy. Leverages data related to G-CSF use are missing. This study aims to (1) describe the practices of G-CSF treatment implementation; (2) identify and measure the decision criteria related to their implementation in patients with breast (BC), lung (LC), or gastrointestinal cancers (GIC), in ambulatory settings, beyond the usual recommendations.
Methods
This non-interventional, cross-sectional, multicenter study required clinical cases presented using conversational interfaces (chatbot), simulating a conversation with one or several virtual interlocutors by voice or text exchange.
Results
The questionnaire was completed by 102 physicians. Most practitioners (84.5%) reported prescribing G-CSF, regardless of tumor type (Table). G-CSF was prescribed more frequently for adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy than for metastatic cases. Leading factors motivating the prescription were chemotherapy regimen, comorbidities, and age (in 56.7% of cases). Access to care was cited as a reason to prescribe G-CSF.
Table: 2047P
Levels and reasons of G-CSF prescription in all 3 cancer types
Breast cancer | Lung cancer | Gastro Intestinal cancer | Total | ||
Implementation of a G-CSF treatment N (%) | N | 77 | 57 | 60 | 194 |
Yes | 68 (88.3%) | 42 (73.7%) | 54 (90.0%) | 164 (84.5%) | |
Not | 9 (11.7%) | 15 (26.3%) | 6 (10.0%) | 30 (15.5%) | |
What should be considered before prescribing a G-CSF for this patient? N (%) | N | 68 | 42 | 54 | 164 |
Chemotherapy Protocol | 23 (33.8%) | 9 (21.4%) | 7 (13.0%) | 39 (23.8%) | |
Chemotherapy Protocol + comorbidities | 12 (17.6%) | 2 (4.8%) | 8 (14.8%) | 22 (13.4%) | |
Chemotherapy Protocol + Age | 2 (2.9%) | 6 (14.3%) | 2 (3.7%) | 10 (6.1%) | |
Chemotherapy Protocol + comorbidities + age | 31 (45.6%) | 25 (59.5%) | 37 (68.5%) | 93 (56.7%) |
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that ESMO recommendations are broadly followed. In most cases, G-CSF is prescribed in early stages and in curative intent. Despite a large use of G-CSF, education about febrile neutropenia and risk factors should be disseminated to a wide audience.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Viatris.
Funding
Viatris.
Disclosure
F. Scotté: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Leo Pharma, Pierre Fabre Oncology, MSD, Amgen, Helsinn, BMS, Pfizer, Thermo Fisher, Alliance Healthcare, Biogaran, Sandoz, Sanofi, Pharmanovia, Viatris.
Resources from the same session
2028TiP - Phase I, non-randomised, open-label, multi-centre dose escalation trial of BI 764532 (DLL3/CD3 IgG-like T cell engager [TcE]) + ezabenlimab (anti-PD-1 antibody) in patients (pts) with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and other neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) expressing DLL3
Presenter: Julien Mazieres
Session: Poster session 06
2029TiP - Phase I study of ABBV-706, an anti-SEZ6 antibody-drug conjugate, alone or in combination in adults with advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Sreenivasa Chandana
Session: Poster session 06
2035P - Routine biomarker monitoring does not replace comprehensive clinical assessment in the detection of immunotherapy induced myocarditis
Presenter: Alexandra Johnson
Session: Poster session 06
2036P - Prevalence and risk evaluation of cardiovascular disease among newly diagnosed prostate cancer population in China
Presenter: Weiyu Zhang
Session: Poster session 06
2037P - Prehabilitation as a strategy to improve postoperative outcomes in frail cancer patients undergoing elective surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Muhammed Elfaituri
Session: Poster session 06
2039P - Primary endpoints of confirmatory randomized controlled trials for older patients with cancer: A scoping review
Presenter: Tomonori Mizutani
Session: Poster session 06
2041P - The prevalence of hematologic adverse events (HAEs) and myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia (MDS/AML) in patients (pts) with advanced high grade ovarian carcinoma (aHGOC) receiving PARP inhibitor (PARPi), with or without a germline BRCA pathogenic variant
Presenter: Carmine Valenza
Session: Poster session 06
2042P - Improving breast cancer outcomes for indigenous women
Presenter: Vita Christie
Session: Poster session 06
2043P - Can Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) assessments predict survival in octogenarians with colorectal cancer?
Presenter: Neda Nikolic
Session: Poster session 06
2044P - Bloodstream infections (BSI) in cancer patients: Epidemiology, antibiotic therapy and risk factors related to mortality
Presenter: Carlos López Jiménez
Session: Poster session 06