Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 06

2047P - Neutrop: A descriptive, observational study for G-CSF prescription in daily practice

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 06

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management

Tumour Site

Presenters

Florian Scotté

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S1080-S1134. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01268-1

Authors

F. Scotté

Author affiliations

  • Interdisciplinary Cancer Course Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 2047P

Background

Despite significant advances in prevention and treatment, febrile neutropenia (FN) remains a common and serious complication of chemotherapy. Leverages data related to G-CSF use are missing. This study aims to (1) describe the practices of G-CSF treatment implementation; (2) identify and measure the decision criteria related to their implementation in patients with breast (BC), lung (LC), or gastrointestinal cancers (GIC), in ambulatory settings, beyond the usual recommendations.

Methods

This non-interventional, cross-sectional, multicenter study required clinical cases presented using conversational interfaces (chatbot), simulating a conversation with one or several virtual interlocutors by voice or text exchange.

Results

The questionnaire was completed by 102 physicians. Most practitioners (84.5%) reported prescribing G-CSF, regardless of tumor type (Table). G-CSF was prescribed more frequently for adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy than for metastatic cases. Leading factors motivating the prescription were chemotherapy regimen, comorbidities, and age (in 56.7% of cases). Access to care was cited as a reason to prescribe G-CSF.

Table: 2047P

Levels and reasons of G-CSF prescription in all 3 cancer types

Breast cancer Lung cancer Gastro Intestinal cancer Total
Implementation of a G-CSF treatment N (%) N 77 57 60 194
Yes 68 (88.3%) 42 (73.7%) 54 (90.0%) 164 (84.5%)
Not 9 (11.7%) 15 (26.3%) 6 (10.0%) 30 (15.5%)
What should be considered before prescribing a G-CSF for this patient? N (%) N 68 42 54 164
Chemotherapy Protocol 23 (33.8%) 9 (21.4%) 7 (13.0%) 39 (23.8%)
Chemotherapy Protocol + comorbidities 12 (17.6%) 2 (4.8%) 8 (14.8%) 22 (13.4%)
Chemotherapy Protocol + Age 2 (2.9%) 6 (14.3%) 2 (3.7%) 10 (6.1%)
Chemotherapy Protocol + comorbidities + age 31 (45.6%) 25 (59.5%) 37 (68.5%) 93 (56.7%)

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that ESMO recommendations are broadly followed. In most cases, G-CSF is prescribed in early stages and in curative intent. Despite a large use of G-CSF, education about febrile neutropenia and risk factors should be disseminated to a wide audience.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Viatris.

Funding

Viatris.

Disclosure

F. Scotté: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Leo Pharma, Pierre Fabre Oncology, MSD, Amgen, Helsinn, BMS, Pfizer, Thermo Fisher, Alliance Healthcare, Biogaran, Sandoz, Sanofi, Pharmanovia, Viatris.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.