Abstract 1009P
Background
Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly lethal disease with limited treatment options. The use of first-line (1L) systemic therapies showcase improved overall survival and quality of life. This study aimed to compare the objective response rate (ORR) of various systemic therapies for advanced HCC in 1L setting using a network meta-analysis.
Methods
A systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to assess the efficacy of 1L systemic therapies for advanced HCC. Multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. The primary outcome of interest was the ORR of each therapy compared to placebo. The results were obtained for both fixed and random-effect models to estimate each therapy's relative risk (RR) and 95% credible intervals (CrI).
Results
A total of 12 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The combination therapy of sintilimab + IBI305 had the highest ORR, with an RR of 13.6 (95% CrI: 3.69, 55.67) using fixed-effect and RR of 14.13 (95% CrI: 0.82, 120.1) using random-effect models. SUCRA values ranged from 0.075 for placebo to 0.761 for sintilimab + IBI30. SUCRA rankings were generally better for combination therapies followed by mono-therapies and placebo.
Conclusions
The NMA revealed that the combination therapies had the highest ORR among the systemic therapies in the 1L setting. The SUCRA values confirmed the high probability of these treatments ranking higher in terms of ORR and can be used to support treatment decision-making in clinical practice.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
G. Kaur, B. Singh, S. Attri, A. Sharma, P. Rai, S. Pandey: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Pharmacoevidence.
Resources from the same session
998P - Efficacy and safety of curative hepatectomy after conversion therapies for initial unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter propensity score matching study
Presenter: Rong-yun Mai
Session: Poster session 18
1000P - Real-world clinical outcomes of cabozantinib (cabo) as a second-line (2L) treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC)
Presenter: Daniel Ahn
Session: Poster session 18
1001P - Patients’ prioritization of treatment goals in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A global qualitative observational study (PERIDOT)
Presenter: Marcus-Alexander Wörns
Session: Poster session 18
1002P - Efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with TKIs and FOLFOX4-HAIC in conversion therapy of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Kai Tan
Session: Poster session 18
1003P - Efficacy and safety of triple combination therapy with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) versus dual combination therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Omar Maaño
Session: Poster session 18
1004P - Comparative efficacy of systemic sequential regorafenib after sorafenib or lenvatinib treatment failure for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective, multi-center, real-world study
Presenter: Danjun Song
Session: Poster session 18
1005P - Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combined with transarterial chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with high tumor burden
Presenter: Jiliang Qiu
Session: Poster session 18
1006P - Associations of online search trends and prescription trends for hepatocellular carcinoma drugs
Presenter: Philipp Berning
Session: Poster session 18
1007P - Network meta-analysis (NMA) of lenvatinib vs key comparators in first-line unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC)
Presenter: David Trueman
Session: Poster session 18