Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 17

119P - Management of biliary tract cancers in older patients: A French multicenter cohort study

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 17

Topics

Tumour Site

Hepatobiliary Cancers

Presenters

Marine Valery

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S215-S232. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01929-4

Authors

M. Valery1, J. Edeline2, J. Henriques3, L. Antoun1, H. Bourien2, A. Lebeaud4, N. Fares5, C. Tournigand6, T. Lecomte7, D. Tougeron8, V. Hautefeuille9, A. Vienot10, N. Williet11, J. Bachet12, D. Malka13, C. Smolenschi1, A. hollebecque1, J. Paccard14, A. Turpin4, A. Boileve1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif, Cedex/FR
  • 2 Medical Oncology Department, Centre Eugene - Marquis, 35042 - Rennes/FR
  • 3 Methodology And Quality Of Life Unit In Oncology, Ea 3181, CHU Besançon, Hôpital Jean Minjoz, 25000 - Besançon/FR
  • 4 Medical Oncology Department, Hopital Claude Huriez, 59037 - Lille/FR
  • 5 Digestive Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse - Hopital Rangueil, 31059 - Toulouse/FR
  • 6 Medical Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri-Mondor AP-HP, 94010 - Creteil/FR
  • 7 Hepato-gastroenterology And Digestive Cancerology, CHU de Tours, Hôpital Trousseau, 37000 - Tours/FR
  • 8 Gastroenterology And Digestive Oncology, CHU Poitiers - Jean Bernard Hôpital, 86000 - Poitiers/FR
  • 9 Gastroenterology And Digestive Oncology Department, CHU Amiens-Picardie - Site Nord, 80054 - Amiens/FR
  • 10 Medical Oncology Department, CHRU Besancon - Hopital Jean Minjoz, 25030 - Besancon/FR
  • 11 Gastroenterology And Digestive Oncology, Hopital Nord, 42055 - St Etienne/FR
  • 12 Hepato-gastroenterology And Digestive Oncology Department, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpetriere, 75013 - Paris/FR
  • 13 Department Of Medical Oncology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 75014 - Paris/FR
  • 14 Medical Oncology And Hepatogastroenterology Department, Hospices Civiles de Lyon - HCL - Lyon University Hospital Center, 69002 - Lyon/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 119P

Background

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) including cholangiocarcinomas (CCA) and gallbladder cancer (GBC) are uncommon tumors with poor prognosis, often diagnosed after age of 70, where comorbidities and altered performance status (PS) are more frequent. We aimed to compare clinical characteristics, molecular profile, and outcomes of patients (pts) with BTC < and ≥ 70 years old.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed in treated BTC pts in 16 French centers from 2003 to 2021. Data on demographics, therapeutic management, molecular profile, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were collected.

Results

Overall, 1256 pts with BTC were included (male, 52%; median age, 64.5 years), including 384 pts (31%) over 70. Older pts had poorer PS (PS ≥2, 17% vs 8%; p<0.0001) and more comorbidities (≥1 comorbidity, 89% vs. 78%; p<0.0001). They were diagnosed more frequently with extrahepatic CCA and GBC (respectively, 18% vs.12% and 16% vs. 13%, p=0.0073) and less advanced disease stage at diagnosis (bilobar liver involvement, 29% vs 37%; p=0.008). They were offered less frequently first-line systemic therapy (87% vs 97%, p<0.0001)(gemcitabine 3% vs 0.3%; gemcis 31% vs 35%; gemox 54% in 2 groups; p=0.007) and molecular profiling (43% vs 65%, p<0.0001) than pts <70. Proportions of actionable alterations were significantly different, with more HER2 amplifications and less IDH1 mutations and FGFR2 fusions in older patients (p=0.0419). MSI status were similar between groups. OS after resection was similar in older and younger pts (median OS, 47.0 months (mo) [95%CI: 37.8-71.9] vs 48.8 mo [95%CI 41.4-57.3]), but shorter in older pts at advanced stage (14.6 [95%CI 12.7-16.5] vs. 17.4 mo [95%CI 16.1-18.9), p<0.0001). First-line PFS did not differ (median, 6.6 mo [95%CI 5.5-7.2] vs 5.8 mo [95%CI, 5.3-6.2), p=0.61).

Conclusions

Older BTC pts presented more frequently eCCA and GBC and a less advanced disease at diagnosis. At advanced stages, older pts had poorer OS and received less often first-line chemotherapy. If treated, PFS of older pts was similar to younger pts. Molecular profiling was less often performed in older pts.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.