Abstract 119P
Background
Biliary tract cancers (BTC) including cholangiocarcinomas (CCA) and gallbladder cancer (GBC) are uncommon tumors with poor prognosis, often diagnosed after age of 70, where comorbidities and altered performance status (PS) are more frequent. We aimed to compare clinical characteristics, molecular profile, and outcomes of patients (pts) with BTC < and ≥ 70 years old.
Methods
A retrospective chart review was performed in treated BTC pts in 16 French centers from 2003 to 2021. Data on demographics, therapeutic management, molecular profile, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were collected.
Results
Overall, 1256 pts with BTC were included (male, 52%; median age, 64.5 years), including 384 pts (31%) over 70. Older pts had poorer PS (PS ≥2, 17% vs 8%; p<0.0001) and more comorbidities (≥1 comorbidity, 89% vs. 78%; p<0.0001). They were diagnosed more frequently with extrahepatic CCA and GBC (respectively, 18% vs.12% and 16% vs. 13%, p=0.0073) and less advanced disease stage at diagnosis (bilobar liver involvement, 29% vs 37%; p=0.008). They were offered less frequently first-line systemic therapy (87% vs 97%, p<0.0001)(gemcitabine 3% vs 0.3%; gemcis 31% vs 35%; gemox 54% in 2 groups; p=0.007) and molecular profiling (43% vs 65%, p<0.0001) than pts <70. Proportions of actionable alterations were significantly different, with more HER2 amplifications and less IDH1 mutations and FGFR2 fusions in older patients (p=0.0419). MSI status were similar between groups. OS after resection was similar in older and younger pts (median OS, 47.0 months (mo) [95%CI: 37.8-71.9] vs 48.8 mo [95%CI 41.4-57.3]), but shorter in older pts at advanced stage (14.6 [95%CI 12.7-16.5] vs. 17.4 mo [95%CI 16.1-18.9), p<0.0001). First-line PFS did not differ (median, 6.6 mo [95%CI 5.5-7.2] vs 5.8 mo [95%CI, 5.3-6.2), p=0.61).
Conclusions
Older BTC pts presented more frequently eCCA and GBC and a less advanced disease at diagnosis. At advanced stages, older pts had poorer OS and received less often first-line chemotherapy. If treated, PFS of older pts was similar to younger pts. Molecular profiling was less often performed in older pts.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
97P - Neoadjuvant durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (D+GemCis) versus gemcis alone for localized biliary tract cancer (BTC): Results of a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II trial (DEBATE)
Presenter: Changhoon Yoo
Session: Poster session 17
101P - Quality of life (QoL) outcomes in patients (pts) with zanidatamab (zani)-treated HER2-positive (HER2+) biliary tract cancer (BTC) in the phase IIb HERIZON-BTC-01 study
Presenter: Harpreet Wasan
Session: Poster session 17
102P - Potentially prognostic factors of overall survival in advanced biliary tract cancer in the randomised phase III TOPAZ-1 study
Presenter: Aiwu Ruth He
Session: Poster session 17
103P - Individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomised trials to compare efficacy of second-line fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC)
Presenter: Jaewon Hyung
Session: Poster session 17
104P - Final analysis of the prospective, randomized phase II STAMP trial: Adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) versus capecitabine (CAP) in node-positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA)
Presenter: Hyehyun Jeong
Session: Poster session 17
105P - A phase II study of SHR-1316 plus IBI310 in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after failure of first-line therapy
Presenter: Jia Fan
Session: Poster session 17