Abstract 699P
Background
As COVID-19 will likely became an epidemic disease, vaccination planning will be crucial for LS-mLC receiving anti-cancer therapy (ACT) in order to prolong effective immunity
Methods
According to the timing of BD and Sars-Cov2 infection (Cov-I) during oncological history, LC pts were allocated in three cohorts: A) Cov-I before PV or third BD; B) uninfected who completed PV during ACT; C) uninfected LC who had completed PV before cancer diagnosis and will receive BD after stating of ACT. As control cohorts, we included other cancer patients (mOC pts) who had completed PV and were candidate to BD during myelosuppressive (cohort D) or not-myelosuppressive (cohort E) ACT. The primary endpoints were seroprevalence of IgG Anti-spike-RBD (anti-S IgG) at two pre-defined time-points (T1: +30-90 days after BD; T2: + 6 months +/- 4 weeks after BD). As exploratory endpoint, we compared median pre-vaccination value of four cytokines (IL-6, IL-2R, TNF-α, IL-10) with post-BD values in immunotherapy-treated pts (IT-pts)
Results
Between October 2021 and February 2022, 113 LS-mLC patients were assigned in cohort A (20 pts), in cohort B (61 pts) or in cohort C (32 pts); 55 LS-mOC patients were allocated in cohort D (25 pts) and in cohort E (30 pts). Throughout the Omicron variant spread, 40 pts (24%) experienced Cov-I before T2 evaluation. Anti-S IgG qualitative seropositivity rate was 100% at T1 and 98.8% at T2. After 6-months FU, hybrid immunization (Cov-I before or after BD), was associated with higher median anti-S IgG trier compared to vaccine alone-induced immunity (p = <0.0001). In uninfected pts, median anti-S IgG titre was significantly lower in IT-treated patients compared to non-IT treated patients (p = 0.02); no difference was found when comparing myelosuppressive or not ACT. Among 68 IT-pts, 5 pts (7.3%) showed significant increase (≥ 1.5 fold) of at least two cytokines in post-BD samples, without reporting ir-AE
Conclusions
Administration BDs of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in LS-mLC pts resulted effective and safe. In IT-pts without recent Cov-I, additional BDs should be considered to prolong serological immunity
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli-IRCCS.
Funding
Grant Award: Vaccinazione Anti-COVID-19 Nei Pazienti Oncologici, Sponsor: AIOM (Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica)/FICOG (Federation of Italian Cooperative Oncology Groups).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
97P - Neoadjuvant durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (D+GemCis) versus gemcis alone for localized biliary tract cancer (BTC): Results of a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II trial (DEBATE)
Presenter: Changhoon Yoo
Session: Poster session 17
101P - Quality of life (QoL) outcomes in patients (pts) with zanidatamab (zani)-treated HER2-positive (HER2+) biliary tract cancer (BTC) in the phase IIb HERIZON-BTC-01 study
Presenter: Harpreet Wasan
Session: Poster session 17
102P - Potentially prognostic factors of overall survival in advanced biliary tract cancer in the randomised phase III TOPAZ-1 study
Presenter: Aiwu Ruth He
Session: Poster session 17
103P - Individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomised trials to compare efficacy of second-line fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC)
Presenter: Jaewon Hyung
Session: Poster session 17
104P - Final analysis of the prospective, randomized phase II STAMP trial: Adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) versus capecitabine (CAP) in node-positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA)
Presenter: Hyehyun Jeong
Session: Poster session 17
105P - A phase II study of SHR-1316 plus IBI310 in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after failure of first-line therapy
Presenter: Jia Fan
Session: Poster session 17