Abstract 1269P
Background
The rate of lung cancer recurrence following curative surgical resection is 30-55% and remains a significant challenge in patient management. Accurate prediction of recurrence risk is crucial for guiding treatment decisions, such as the use of (neo-)adjuvant chemo- or immunotherapy, the extent of lung resection, and follow-up strategies. We present a preoperative machine learning model that uses patient computed tomography (CT) images and demographic features to predict lung cancer recurrence.
Methods
We collected a dataset of 588 clinical stage I-IIIA lung cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment for lung cancer, of which 147 had lung cancer recurrence. This includes retrospectively collected CT images and associated demographic and pathological data from patients in both screening and clinical settings from the US National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) and the North Estonia Medical Centre (NEMC). The preoperative model was trained to predict the likelihood of recurrence on a diverse set of features, including radiomic features extracted from CT images and relevant clinical variables. An 8-fold cross validation strategy was used, where, in each fold, 6 (of the 8 equally sized) subsets were used for training, one for model tuning, and one for validation. As a baseline, we compare the preoperative model to ranked clinical staging. Performance was evaluated using the Area-Under-the-ROC-Curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.
Results
Lung cancer recurrence prediction results are tabulated below. We find that our model performs significantly better (AUC=61.4, Sen=18.2) than preoperative staging alone (AUC=56.1, Sen=16.4, p-value=0.035). Table: 1269P
AUC, sensitivity and specificity performance of our machine learning model compared with ranked TNM staging. The specificity is set to 90.0 for a rule-in context
Predictors | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity |
TNM | 56.1 (51.1, 61.2) | 16.4 (10.1, 23.6) | 90.0 |
Our model | 61.4 (56.7, 66.3) | 18.2 (10.2, 24.5) | 90.0 |
Conclusions
Based on this retrospective analysis, we find that our model outperforms clinical staging prediction of lung cancer recurrence in preoperative settings. With further development, this algorithm could prove a valuable tool to aid the management of lung cancer patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Optellum.
Funding
Optellum.
Disclosure
A. Gasimova, N. Waterfield Price, L. Freitag: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Optellum. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
457P - Disparities in receipt of CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy as therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the real-world setting
Presenter: Gretchen Kimmick
Session: Poster session 04
458P - Metastatic breast cancer: How and how often do we communicate? Results from an Italian national survey
Presenter: Camilla Lisanti
Session: Poster session 04
460P - Impact of fulvestrant utilization on prognostic outcome among patients with HR+ve/HER2-ve metastatic breast cancer: Results from a real-world dataset
Presenter: Shaheenah Dawood
Session: Poster session 04
462P - Health outcomes of treatment sequences with eribulin or other single agents’ chemotherapy for treating relapsed metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Simone Rivolo
Session: Poster session 04
463P - Impact of two waves of Sars-Cov-2 outbreak on the clinical presentation and outcomes of newly referred breast cancer cases at AP-HP: A retrospective multicenter cohort study
Presenter: Sonia Priou
Session: Poster session 04
464P - Developing a prognostic risk stratification model and treatment options for HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis
Presenter: JiaXin Chen
Session: Poster session 04
465P - Reporting of older subgroups enrolled to registration breast cancer trials, 2012-2021
Presenter: Colm Mac Eochagain
Session: Poster session 04