Abstract 2285P
Background
Due to a compromised immune system, cancer patients are more prone to have a weaker response to COVID-19 vaccination, which can lead to a worst outcome. Thus it is crucial to evaluate the immunological response of cancer patients to booster doses of the vaccine to stratify the patients accordingly and provide a better care.
Methods
Vaccinated cancer patients from the Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, under active cancer treatment with different types of solid tumours (SL) and liquid tumours (LT) were included to study the potential differences in the response to COVID-19 booster dose vaccine according to tumour type. Humoral immune response to the booster dose of the COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated in patients’ serum samples analysing IgG levels against SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) protein. We also analysed the IgG levels against SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid (N) protein to address previous contact with the virus. The first cohort of patients collected samples before the booster dose and 3 and 6 months after (cohort 1, N=54, SL=44, LT=10) and the other cohort collected samples only 3 and 6 months after booster dose (cohort 2, N=71, SL=45, LT=26). A group of vaccinated healthy individuals (N=83) was also analysed, and they collected samples at 3 and 6 months post-boost.
Results
Regarding cohort 1, for solid tumours, we observed that IgG S levels increased 3 months after boost (p<0.001) and remained high at 6 months post-boost (p<0.001) when compared to pre-boost. One the other hand, the hematologic tumours demonstrated a weak response to vaccination since IgG S levels remained very low 3 and 6 months after the boost. When comparing 3 months post-boost in both cohorts and healthy individuals, we observed that the healthy individuals had the strongest IgG S response, followed by the solid and, lastly, the hematologic tumours. In fact, the difference between solid and haematological tumours was quite significant (p=0.017).
Conclusions
We verified that the type of tumour may influence COVID-19 vaccination efficacy since solid cancer patients had a better response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination when compared to haematological cancer patients. Moreover, as expected, healthy individuals have a stronger immune response when compared to cancer patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Rui Medeiros, Júlio Oliveira.
Funding
AstraZeneca.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2295P - Pan-cancer prevalence of MET fusions and clinical response to MET- targeted therapy
Presenter: Morana Vojnic
Session: Poster session 08
2296P - SGLT2 i dapagliflozin reduces NF-kB expression in heart and kidneys of preclinical models exposed to doxorubicin through MYd-88 and NLRP3 pathways
Presenter: Nicola Maurea
Session: Poster session 08
2297P - Gene co-expression networks capture the potential pathogenesis and progression of upper tract urothelial cancer
Presenter: Tingting Fu
Session: Poster session 08
2298P - Feasibility of ex vivo drug sensitivity testing in urothelial cancer: EVITA trial
Presenter: Mathijs Scholtes
Session: Poster session 08
2299P - Mebendazole enhances the anticancer effect of irinotecan and check-point inhibitor in vitro and in vivo
Presenter: Sharmineh Mansoori
Session: Poster session 08
2300P - Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) as monotherapy: Analysis of the PREMIS study
Presenter: Julieta Rodriguez
Session: Poster session 08
2301P - Combining cancer patient spatial transcriptomics and bulk RNA-Seq data to drive insights into NSCLC
Presenter: Julia Bischof
Session: Poster session 08
2302P - Efficacy assessment of targeted and immunotherapies for personalised treatment of melanoma using 2D and 3D ex-vivo assays
Presenter: Md Marufur Rahman
Session: Poster session 08
2303P - Protein functional interpretation of gene variants observed in clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS) for pleural mesothelioma
Presenter: Ferdinando Cerciello
Session: Poster session 08
2304P - A phase II study of tepotinib in patients with advanced solid cancers harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutations or amplification (KCSG AL19 -17)
Presenter: Eun Joo Kang
Session: Poster session 08