Abstract 2285P
Background
Due to a compromised immune system, cancer patients are more prone to have a weaker response to COVID-19 vaccination, which can lead to a worst outcome. Thus it is crucial to evaluate the immunological response of cancer patients to booster doses of the vaccine to stratify the patients accordingly and provide a better care.
Methods
Vaccinated cancer patients from the Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, under active cancer treatment with different types of solid tumours (SL) and liquid tumours (LT) were included to study the potential differences in the response to COVID-19 booster dose vaccine according to tumour type. Humoral immune response to the booster dose of the COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated in patients’ serum samples analysing IgG levels against SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) protein. We also analysed the IgG levels against SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid (N) protein to address previous contact with the virus. The first cohort of patients collected samples before the booster dose and 3 and 6 months after (cohort 1, N=54, SL=44, LT=10) and the other cohort collected samples only 3 and 6 months after booster dose (cohort 2, N=71, SL=45, LT=26). A group of vaccinated healthy individuals (N=83) was also analysed, and they collected samples at 3 and 6 months post-boost.
Results
Regarding cohort 1, for solid tumours, we observed that IgG S levels increased 3 months after boost (p<0.001) and remained high at 6 months post-boost (p<0.001) when compared to pre-boost. One the other hand, the hematologic tumours demonstrated a weak response to vaccination since IgG S levels remained very low 3 and 6 months after the boost. When comparing 3 months post-boost in both cohorts and healthy individuals, we observed that the healthy individuals had the strongest IgG S response, followed by the solid and, lastly, the hematologic tumours. In fact, the difference between solid and haematological tumours was quite significant (p=0.017).
Conclusions
We verified that the type of tumour may influence COVID-19 vaccination efficacy since solid cancer patients had a better response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination when compared to haematological cancer patients. Moreover, as expected, healthy individuals have a stronger immune response when compared to cancer patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Rui Medeiros, Júlio Oliveira.
Funding
AstraZeneca.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2283P - Assessing the replicative potential of the oncolytic virus VSV-GP in patient-derived tumor biopsies ex vivo
Presenter: Benjamin Schoeps
Session: Poster session 08
2284P - Pre-clinical assessment of the therapeutic potential of a CD80-Fc-armed oncolytic virus (VSV-GP-CD80Fc)
Presenter: Andreas Ackermann
Session: Poster session 08
2286P - COVID-19 vaccinations in cancer patients (pts): An individual participant data meta-analysis of the International Consortium on COVID vaccination in cancer
Presenter: Ha Mo Linh Le
Session: Poster session 08
2288P - Recolony-treating solid tumors with a bacteria-based approach
Presenter: Egle Katkeviciute
Session: Poster session 08
2289P - Determining anti-cancer efficacy of a reversible LSD1 inhibitor, EXS74539, in primary AML tissues with limited thrombocytopenic effects
Presenter: Christophe Boudesco
Session: Poster session 08
2291P - WU-NK-101, best in class memory-NK cell, has key features vital for adoptive cell therapy (ACT) in solid tumors (ST)
Presenter: John Muth
Session: Poster session 08
2292P - Prevalence of druggable EGFR genomic alterations in solid tumours other than lung cancer
Presenter: Tomohiro Kondo
Session: Poster session 08
2293P - Protumoral role of neutrophils and neutrophils extracellular traps (NETS) in non-metastatic gastroesophageal and rectal cancers
Presenter: Carlotta Catozzi
Session: Poster session 08
2294P - Whole genome sequencing to define the germline-somatic interaction in young-onset lung cancer
Presenter: Jaclyn LoPiccolo
Session: Poster session 08