Abstract 1750P
Background
Hepatitis B and C virus (HBV, HCV) reactivations are an emerging problem. Several societies have composed screening guidelines, but HBV reactivation still occurs in daily practice. This survey aims to assess knowledge and awareness of HBV/HCV reactivation in oncologists.
Methods
A questionnaire was designed to assess descriptive variables (i.e., subdiscipline, years of experience, working in an academic center, and having witnessed an HBV reactivation in clinical practice) and nine content questions (four background and five clinically oriented). The survey was disseminated in spring 2022 in 11 hospitals in Belgium (3 university, 8 non-university).
Results
Table: 1750P
Characteristics of responding oncologists
N=64 | % | ||
Subdiscipline | Solid tumours | 33 | 52.4 |
Haematological malignancies | 21 | 33.3 | |
Gastrointestinal tumours | 9 | 14.3 | |
Years of experience | <5 years | 20 | 31.2 |
>5 years | 44 | 68.8 | |
Working in an academic center | Yes | 26 | 40.6 |
No | 38 | 59.4 | |
Already witnessed a HBV reactivation in clinical practice | Yes | 24 | 37.5 |
No | 40 | 62.5 |
The table provides an overview of characteristics of responding oncologists. Mean overall scores were 33.7%, and mean scores for background and clinical questions were 20.3% and 44.4%, respectively. Less than half of participating oncologists was aware of universal HBV screening prior to initiation of chemotherapy (48.4%) and immunosuppression (37.5%). Only 7.8% of them was aware of the high reactivation risk that comes with administration of anthracyclines. Moreover, oncologists that have already witnessed a hepatitis B reactivation in clinical practice, are better aware of hepatitis B screening guidelines prior to administration of chemotherapy (p=0.005) and immunosuppression (p=0.033).
Conclusions
Knowledge of HBV/HCV reactivation is insufficient in oncologists. In addition, HBV screening guidelines prior to initiation of chemotherapy and immunosuppression are poorly implemented, given that over one third of responding oncologists already witnessed an HBV reactivation in clinical practice. Encouragingly, these respondents are also better aware of HBV screening guidelines. Oncology organisations play an important role in raising awareness and providing clear guidance.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Gilead Sciences.
Disclosure
M. Coessens: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel Grant: Gilead Sciences. W. Verlinden: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Grant: Gilead Sciences; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Gilead Sciences. J. Schouten: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Grant: Gilead Sciences. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1902P - Comparison of cabozantinib (CABO) versus sunitinib (SUN) following first-line (1L) nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A target trial emulation using real-world data from the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC)
Presenter: Audreylie Lemelin
Session: Poster session 23
1903P - Tumor response by baseline metastases in patients (pts) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with lenvatinib (L) plus pembrolizumab (P) vs sunitinib (S): Post hoc analysis of the CLEAR trial
Presenter: Viktor Gruenwald
Session: Poster session 23
1904P - Treatment options and outcome of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with brain or bone metastases: A real-world evidence from a German retrospective multi-center analysis
Presenter: Pia Paffenholz
Session: Poster session 23
1905P - Heterogeneity in tertiary lymphoid structures predicts the distinct prognosis and immune microenvironment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Wenhao Xu
Session: Poster session 23
1906P - Metastasized non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Which entities are dangerous? Results learned from reference pathology of the SuniForecast study
Presenter: Arndt Hartmann
Session: Poster session 23
1907P - Multi-omics mapping positions antigenic myeloid-T cell crosstalk at the core of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)
Presenter: Lisa Kinget
Session: Poster session 23
1908P - Utility of circulating tumor (ct)DNA testing for molecular residual disease (MRD) detection and treatment response monitoring in patients (pts) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Michael Smigelski
Session: Poster session 23
1909P - Baseline cytokine levels according to the line of treatment in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab: NIVOREN GETUG-AFU 26 translational study
Presenter: Larissa Rainho
Session: Poster session 23
1910P - Evaluation of a genome-wide methylome enrichment platform for circulating tumor DNA quantification and prognostic performance in renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Brian Rini
Session: Poster session 23
1911P - Effect of VHL mutations on efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Guojie Yu
Session: Poster session 23