Abstract 1750P
Background
Hepatitis B and C virus (HBV, HCV) reactivations are an emerging problem. Several societies have composed screening guidelines, but HBV reactivation still occurs in daily practice. This survey aims to assess knowledge and awareness of HBV/HCV reactivation in oncologists.
Methods
A questionnaire was designed to assess descriptive variables (i.e., subdiscipline, years of experience, working in an academic center, and having witnessed an HBV reactivation in clinical practice) and nine content questions (four background and five clinically oriented). The survey was disseminated in spring 2022 in 11 hospitals in Belgium (3 university, 8 non-university).
Results
Table: 1750P
Characteristics of responding oncologists
N=64 | % | ||
Subdiscipline | Solid tumours | 33 | 52.4 |
Haematological malignancies | 21 | 33.3 | |
Gastrointestinal tumours | 9 | 14.3 | |
Years of experience | <5 years | 20 | 31.2 |
>5 years | 44 | 68.8 | |
Working in an academic center | Yes | 26 | 40.6 |
No | 38 | 59.4 | |
Already witnessed a HBV reactivation in clinical practice | Yes | 24 | 37.5 |
No | 40 | 62.5 |
The table provides an overview of characteristics of responding oncologists. Mean overall scores were 33.7%, and mean scores for background and clinical questions were 20.3% and 44.4%, respectively. Less than half of participating oncologists was aware of universal HBV screening prior to initiation of chemotherapy (48.4%) and immunosuppression (37.5%). Only 7.8% of them was aware of the high reactivation risk that comes with administration of anthracyclines. Moreover, oncologists that have already witnessed a hepatitis B reactivation in clinical practice, are better aware of hepatitis B screening guidelines prior to administration of chemotherapy (p=0.005) and immunosuppression (p=0.033).
Conclusions
Knowledge of HBV/HCV reactivation is insufficient in oncologists. In addition, HBV screening guidelines prior to initiation of chemotherapy and immunosuppression are poorly implemented, given that over one third of responding oncologists already witnessed an HBV reactivation in clinical practice. Encouragingly, these respondents are also better aware of HBV screening guidelines. Oncology organisations play an important role in raising awareness and providing clear guidance.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Gilead Sciences.
Disclosure
M. Coessens: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel Grant: Gilead Sciences. W. Verlinden: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Grant: Gilead Sciences; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Gilead Sciences. J. Schouten: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Grant: Gilead Sciences. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2375P - Neoadjuvant sintilimab combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients followed by selective bladder sparing surgery
Presenter: Zhou Tong
Session: Poster session 23
2376P - Pembrolizumab monotherapy following tri-modality treatment for selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Shang Bin Qin
Session: Poster session 23
2378P - Efficacy and safety outcomes with pembrolizumab (pembro) rechallenge for patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (UC) who responded to first-course treatment
Presenter: Vadim Koshkin
Session: Poster session 23
2379P - AVENANCE: Subgroup analysis of patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) with histological variants from a real-world (RW) study of avelumab first-line maintenance (1LM)
Presenter: Philippe Barthélémy
Session: Poster session 23