Abstract 1750P
Background
Hepatitis B and C virus (HBV, HCV) reactivations are an emerging problem. Several societies have composed screening guidelines, but HBV reactivation still occurs in daily practice. This survey aims to assess knowledge and awareness of HBV/HCV reactivation in oncologists.
Methods
A questionnaire was designed to assess descriptive variables (i.e., subdiscipline, years of experience, working in an academic center, and having witnessed an HBV reactivation in clinical practice) and nine content questions (four background and five clinically oriented). The survey was disseminated in spring 2022 in 11 hospitals in Belgium (3 university, 8 non-university).
Results
Table: 1750P
Characteristics of responding oncologists
N=64 | % | ||
Subdiscipline | Solid tumours | 33 | 52.4 |
Haematological malignancies | 21 | 33.3 | |
Gastrointestinal tumours | 9 | 14.3 | |
Years of experience | <5 years | 20 | 31.2 |
>5 years | 44 | 68.8 | |
Working in an academic center | Yes | 26 | 40.6 |
No | 38 | 59.4 | |
Already witnessed a HBV reactivation in clinical practice | Yes | 24 | 37.5 |
No | 40 | 62.5 |
The table provides an overview of characteristics of responding oncologists. Mean overall scores were 33.7%, and mean scores for background and clinical questions were 20.3% and 44.4%, respectively. Less than half of participating oncologists was aware of universal HBV screening prior to initiation of chemotherapy (48.4%) and immunosuppression (37.5%). Only 7.8% of them was aware of the high reactivation risk that comes with administration of anthracyclines. Moreover, oncologists that have already witnessed a hepatitis B reactivation in clinical practice, are better aware of hepatitis B screening guidelines prior to administration of chemotherapy (p=0.005) and immunosuppression (p=0.033).
Conclusions
Knowledge of HBV/HCV reactivation is insufficient in oncologists. In addition, HBV screening guidelines prior to initiation of chemotherapy and immunosuppression are poorly implemented, given that over one third of responding oncologists already witnessed an HBV reactivation in clinical practice. Encouragingly, these respondents are also better aware of HBV screening guidelines. Oncology organisations play an important role in raising awareness and providing clear guidance.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Gilead Sciences.
Disclosure
M. Coessens: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel Grant: Gilead Sciences. W. Verlinden: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Grant: Gilead Sciences; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Gilead Sciences. J. Schouten: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Grant: Gilead Sciences. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1890P - Switch-maintenance therapy with nivolumab in TKI-sensitive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Subgroup analysis for PD-L1 status of a randomized phase II study (NIVOSWITCH)
Presenter: Christopher Darr
Session: Poster session 23
1891P - Determinants of exceptional response to immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Renee Saliby
Session: Poster session 23
1892P - A pooled meta-analysis of salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab (N+I) after nivolumab (N) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Rana McKay
Session: Poster session 23
1895P - Time to treatment failure (TTF) and treatment beyond progression (TBP) in pretreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients (pts) receiving nivolumab: A survival outcome and a therapeutic strategy of clinical benefit (meet-uro 15)
Presenter: Sara Elena Rebuzzi
Session: Poster session 23
1896P - Clinical management and outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) treated with nivolumab+ipilimumab (N+I): A real-world study
Presenter: Tom Geldart
Session: Poster session 23
1897P - Geographical differences in the management of metastatic de novo renal cell carcinoma in the era of immune-combinations
Presenter: Francesco Massari
Session: Poster session 23
1899P - Comparative effectiveness of second-line (2L) treatment (Rx) with cabozantinib (cabo) in patients (pts) with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) after first-line (1L) Rx with ipilimumab + nivolumab (ipi+nivo) vs. PD-1/L1 inhibitor (PDI) + tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)
Presenter: Georges Gebrael
Session: Poster session 23
1900P - Role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) in the era of immunotherapy (IO): An analysis of the national cancer database (2004-2020)
Presenter: ALINA BASNET
Session: Poster session 23