Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 22

1583P - Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases of gastric origin: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 22

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy;  Statistics;  Surgical Oncology

Tumour Site

Gastric Cancer

Presenters

Niels Guchelaar

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S852-S886. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01930-0

Authors

N.A.D. Guchelaar1, K. Nasserinejad2, B. Mostert1, S.L. Koolen1, P.C. van der Sluis3, S.M. Lagarde3, B.P.L. Wijnhoven3, R.H. Mathijssen1, B.J. Noordman3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 CE - Rotterdam/NL
  • 2 Department Of Hematology, Hovon Data Center, Erasmus MC, 3000 CA - Rotterdam/NL
  • 3 Department Of Surgery, Division Of Surgical Oncology And Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 CE - Rotterdam/NL

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1583P

Background

Gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases is associated with a dismal prognosis. Catheter-based intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) are methods to deliver chemotherapy intraperitoneally leading to higher intraperitoneal concentrations of cytotoxic drugs, compared to intravenous administration. We reviewed the effectiveness of palliative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric origin.

Methods

Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched for articles on chemotherapy with palliative intent in patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric origin published up to April 2023. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included toxicity and clinicopathological outcomes in patients that underwent conversion surgery. A Bayesian random effect model was used to calculate the pooled median overall survival (mOS).

Results

21 studies including 904 patients were retrieved, categorized in 3 treatment groups (IP docetaxel, IP paclitaxel and PIPAC). The pooled mOS for all intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatments was 14.2 months (95% CI: 10.8 – 17.7 months). The pooled hazard ratio of IP paclitaxel and docetaxel favored the combination of IP and systemic chemotherapy compared to systemic chemotherapy only (0.64, 95% CI: 0.47 – 0.86). mOS of IP paclitaxel, IP docetaxel and PIPAC with cisplatin and doxorubicin were respectively 18.3 months (95% CI: 14.0 – 22.7 months), 13.2 months (95% CI: 3.6 – 25.1 months) and 9.0 months (95% CI: 2.3 – 16.5 months). All treatment methods had a relatively safe toxicity profile. Conversion surgery was performed in 14% of the patients and a radical resection was achieved in 69%, with a mOS ranging from 24 to 33 months.

Conclusions

Patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric origin treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy had a pooled median overall survival of 14.2 months and a pooled hazard ratio of 0.64 compared to systemic chemotherapy. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy, regardless of method of administration, is a safe treatment and conversion surgery is possible in a selected subset of patients.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

B. Mostert: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Sanofi, Pfizer, BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Lilly, Servier; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: BMS. B.P.L. Wijnhoven: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: BMS. R.H. Mathijssen: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Investigator-initiated research: Astellas, Bayer, Cristal Therapeutics, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Pamgene. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.