Abstract 1583P
Background
Gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases is associated with a dismal prognosis. Catheter-based intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) are methods to deliver chemotherapy intraperitoneally leading to higher intraperitoneal concentrations of cytotoxic drugs, compared to intravenous administration. We reviewed the effectiveness of palliative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric origin.
Methods
Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched for articles on chemotherapy with palliative intent in patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric origin published up to April 2023. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included toxicity and clinicopathological outcomes in patients that underwent conversion surgery. A Bayesian random effect model was used to calculate the pooled median overall survival (mOS).
Results
21 studies including 904 patients were retrieved, categorized in 3 treatment groups (IP docetaxel, IP paclitaxel and PIPAC). The pooled mOS for all intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatments was 14.2 months (95% CI: 10.8 – 17.7 months). The pooled hazard ratio of IP paclitaxel and docetaxel favored the combination of IP and systemic chemotherapy compared to systemic chemotherapy only (0.64, 95% CI: 0.47 – 0.86). mOS of IP paclitaxel, IP docetaxel and PIPAC with cisplatin and doxorubicin were respectively 18.3 months (95% CI: 14.0 – 22.7 months), 13.2 months (95% CI: 3.6 – 25.1 months) and 9.0 months (95% CI: 2.3 – 16.5 months). All treatment methods had a relatively safe toxicity profile. Conversion surgery was performed in 14% of the patients and a radical resection was achieved in 69%, with a mOS ranging from 24 to 33 months.
Conclusions
Patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric origin treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy had a pooled median overall survival of 14.2 months and a pooled hazard ratio of 0.64 compared to systemic chemotherapy. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy, regardless of method of administration, is a safe treatment and conversion surgery is possible in a selected subset of patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
B. Mostert: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Sanofi, Pfizer, BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Lilly, Servier; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: BMS. B.P.L. Wijnhoven: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: BMS. R.H. Mathijssen: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Investigator-initiated research: Astellas, Bayer, Cristal Therapeutics, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Pamgene. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1645P - STAT3, ACTA2, and SPARC stromal markers predict response to Gemcitabine/Cisplatin/Nab-paclitaxel (GCN) in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (apdac)
Presenter: Himil Mahadevia
Session: Poster session 22
1646P - Genomic and prognostic differences in patients with different KRAS mutations in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Chunwei Xu
Session: Poster session 22
1647P - Cancer-associated endocrine cell: A novel component of tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Yuan Chen
Session: Poster session 22
1648P - Association between circulating tumor cell count and thrombosis in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Monica Benavente
Session: Poster session 22
1649P - Comprehensive genomic profiling contributes to the prognosis of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Eiichiro So
Session: Poster session 22
1650P - Identification of potential targets in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: The KRAS Wild-Type subset
Presenter: Daniel Acosta Eyzaguirre
Session: Poster session 22
1651P - Comparison of surgical outcome and prognostic factors between pancreaticobiliary and intestinal types of periampullary adenocarcinoma following pancreaticoduodenectomy
Presenter: Saad Anwar
Session: Poster session 22
1652P - Interaction between enhanced cytokine signalling and ferroptosis defence fuels obesity-associated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma oncogenesis
Presenter: Rishat Ruzi
Session: Poster session 22
1653P - The activated thermogenesis of intra-pancreatic fat fuels the progression of pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Xi'n'peng Yin
Session: Poster session 22
1654P - Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) as prognostic factor for pancreatic cancer: Updated of a prospective study
Presenter: Natalia Gutierrez Alonso
Session: Poster session 22