Abstract 103P
Background
For patients (pts) with advanced BTC with progression on gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis), fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy, including liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) and 5-FU/LV plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) showed clinical benefit in prior randomized trials (NIFTY and ABC-06). However, there is no trial for head-to-head comparison among these agents.
Methods
We performed IPD meta-analysis of two multicenter, randomized trials performed in South Korea, which compared efficacy of second-line chemotherapy for advanced BTC after progression on GemCis, including the phase 2b NIFTY trial (nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV vs. 5-FU/LV, NCT03524508) and the phase 2 FIReFOX trial (modified FOLFOX [mFOLFOX] vs. modified 5-FU/LV plus irinotecan [mFOLFIRI], NCT03464968). ITT population of the two trials were included and survival outcomes were compared between the 4 treatment groups by pairwise log-rank test. Hazards ratio (HR) adjusted by potential prognostic variables was estimated by Cox proportional hazards modeling with shared frailty to account for the trials effect.
Results
A total of 278 pts were included in this analysis (178 pts from the NIFTY trial and 99 pts from the FIReFOX trial). The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group (n=88) showed significantly better overall survival compared to the mFOLFOX group (n=49, p = 0.02), mFOLFIRI group (n=50, p = 0.03), and 5-FU/LV group (n=90, p = 0.008). Multivariable analysis showed consistent trends with adjusted HR of 1.44 (95% CI 0.93-2.07, p = 0.11), 1.36 (95% CI 0.92-2.03, p = 0.13), and 1.52 (95% CI 1.37-1.09-2.10, p = 0.01), respectively. Also, nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group showed trends toward better progression-free survival compared to the other 3 groups with adjusted HR of 1.44 (95% CI 0.98-2.11, p = 0.06), 1.29 (95% CI 0.87-1.89, p = 0.20), and 1.88 (1.38-2.55, p < 0.001), respectively.
Conclusions
Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV showed better survival outcomes when compared to mFOLFOX, mFOLFIRI, or 5-FU/LV alone. Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV may be a preferable second-line regimen for advanced BTC pts without targetable genetic alterations.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Servier.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
690P - Ifinatamab deruxtecan (I-DXd; DS-7300) in patients with advanced solid tumors: Updated clinical and biomarker results from a phase I/II study
Presenter: Manish R Patel
Session: Poster session 17
691P - Efficacy of ABBV-400 monotherapy in patients with MET gene amplified advanced solid tumors
Presenter: John Strickler
Session: Poster session 17
692P - First-in-human study of ELU001, a targeted nanoparticle drug conjugate, in subjects with folate receptor α (FRα) overexpressing solid tumors
Presenter: Wen wee Ma
Session: Poster session 17
693P - Preclinical activity of HLX43, a PD-L1-targeting ADC, in multiple PD-1/PD-L1 refractory/resistant models
Presenter: Yongqiang Shan
Session: Poster session 17
694P - Full efficacy analysis of phase I/II trial investigating bexmarilimab, a novel macrophage-guided immunotherapy in refractory solid tumors
Presenter: Petri Bono
Session: Poster session 17
695P - A phase I/Ib study evaluating the safety and tolerability of NIZ985 alone and in combination with spartalizumab (anti–PD-1) in patients (pts) with solid tumors or lymphoma
Presenter: Elena Garralda
Session: Poster session 17
696P - SIM1811-03 (SIM0235), an anti-tumor necrosis factor receptor-2 (TNFR2) monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumor and/or cutaneous T cell lymphomas (CTCL): Preliminary results from an on-going first-in-human phase I trial in China
Presenter: Furong Liu
Session: Poster session 17
699P - Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in long-survivor (LS) patients with metastatic lung cancer (mLC) after primary immunization (PV) and booster (BD): COVALENCE study
Presenter: Emanuele Vita
Session: Poster session 17