Abstract 1646P
Background
Approximately 90% of pancreatic cancer patients carry KRAS mutations, and about 80% of pancreatic cancer patients are diagnosed at advanced stage with poor efficacy of first-line treatment. Currently, several anti-tumor small molecule drugs targeting KRAS are under clinical investigation. Exploring the genomic and prognostic information of KRAS-mutated patients can help identify suitable pancreatic cancer patients for targeted therapy.
Methods
From 2017 to 2020, a total of 487 tumor samples were collected from pancreatic cancer patients across China. The laboratory Origimed, certified by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA), conducted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 450 cancer-related genes (YUANSUTM) in Shanghai, China.
Results
In this study, we found that among 487 patients with pancreatic cancer, the percentages of KRAS G12, non-G12 KRAS mutations, and KRAS wild-type were 79.9%, 7.8%, and 12.3%, respectively. Furthermore, we found that pancreatic cancer patients with KRAS mutations were more likely to have TP53 mutations (82.2% vs 78.4% vs 48.3%, p=9.7x10-8), while BRAF (23.3% vs 2.6% vs 0.5%, p=3.0x10-11) and CTNNB1 (21.7% vs 5.3% vs 1.3%, p=1.2x10-8) were more common mutated genes in KRAS wild-type patients. We found that patients with non-G12 mutations had significantly higher TMB than those with G12 mutations and KRAS wild-type (4.1 vs 2.3, p=0.0008), and this group of patients had significantly lower OS after receiving first-line chemotherapy in our cohort (249 days VS 352 days VS NA, p=0.013), but no difference was observed in PFS.
Conclusions
In this study, we elucidated the genomic differences among pancreatic cancer patients with KRAS G12, non-G12, and KRAS wild-type mutations. Furthermore, we found that patients with non-G12 KRAS mutations had lower OS after receiving first-line chemotherapy compared to other patients, and these patients had higher TMB levels.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1644P - The mutation landscape and evolution pattern of liver or peritoneal metastasis in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Guoliang Yao
Session: Poster session 22
1645P - STAT3, ACTA2, and SPARC stromal markers predict response to Gemcitabine/Cisplatin/Nab-paclitaxel (GCN) in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (apdac)
Presenter: Himil Mahadevia
Session: Poster session 22
1647P - Cancer-associated endocrine cell: A novel component of tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Yuan Chen
Session: Poster session 22
1648P - Association between circulating tumor cell count and thrombosis in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Monica Benavente
Session: Poster session 22
1649P - Comprehensive genomic profiling contributes to the prognosis of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Eiichiro So
Session: Poster session 22
1650P - Identification of potential targets in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: The KRAS Wild-Type subset
Presenter: Daniel Acosta Eyzaguirre
Session: Poster session 22
1651P - Comparison of surgical outcome and prognostic factors between pancreaticobiliary and intestinal types of periampullary adenocarcinoma following pancreaticoduodenectomy
Presenter: Saad Anwar
Session: Poster session 22
1652P - Interaction between enhanced cytokine signalling and ferroptosis defence fuels obesity-associated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma oncogenesis
Presenter: Rishat Ruzi
Session: Poster session 22
1653P - The activated thermogenesis of intra-pancreatic fat fuels the progression of pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Xi'n'peng Yin
Session: Poster session 22
1654P - Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) as prognostic factor for pancreatic cancer: Updated of a prospective study
Presenter: Natalia Gutierrez Alonso
Session: Poster session 22