Abstract 1646P
Background
Approximately 90% of pancreatic cancer patients carry KRAS mutations, and about 80% of pancreatic cancer patients are diagnosed at advanced stage with poor efficacy of first-line treatment. Currently, several anti-tumor small molecule drugs targeting KRAS are under clinical investigation. Exploring the genomic and prognostic information of KRAS-mutated patients can help identify suitable pancreatic cancer patients for targeted therapy.
Methods
From 2017 to 2020, a total of 487 tumor samples were collected from pancreatic cancer patients across China. The laboratory Origimed, certified by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA), conducted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 450 cancer-related genes (YUANSUTM) in Shanghai, China.
Results
In this study, we found that among 487 patients with pancreatic cancer, the percentages of KRAS G12, non-G12 KRAS mutations, and KRAS wild-type were 79.9%, 7.8%, and 12.3%, respectively. Furthermore, we found that pancreatic cancer patients with KRAS mutations were more likely to have TP53 mutations (82.2% vs 78.4% vs 48.3%, p=9.7x10-8), while BRAF (23.3% vs 2.6% vs 0.5%, p=3.0x10-11) and CTNNB1 (21.7% vs 5.3% vs 1.3%, p=1.2x10-8) were more common mutated genes in KRAS wild-type patients. We found that patients with non-G12 mutations had significantly higher TMB than those with G12 mutations and KRAS wild-type (4.1 vs 2.3, p=0.0008), and this group of patients had significantly lower OS after receiving first-line chemotherapy in our cohort (249 days VS 352 days VS NA, p=0.013), but no difference was observed in PFS.
Conclusions
In this study, we elucidated the genomic differences among pancreatic cancer patients with KRAS G12, non-G12, and KRAS wild-type mutations. Furthermore, we found that patients with non-G12 KRAS mutations had lower OS after receiving first-line chemotherapy compared to other patients, and these patients had higher TMB levels.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1589P - Systemic treatment strategies and outcomes of patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric origin
Presenter: Niels Guchelaar
Session: Poster session 22
1590P - Real-world gastric cancer (GC) in Latin America (LATAM) and Europe (EU)
Presenter: Berenice Freile
Session: Poster session 22
1591P - Gastric cancer in young patients under 40 years: 5-year analyses of Georgian cancer registry
Presenter: Tamar Esakia
Session: Poster session 22
1617P - PRODIGE 29-UCGI 26 (NEOPAN): Quality of life results of a phase III randomised trial comparing chemotherapy with folfirinox (FFX) or gemcitabine (gem) in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC)
Presenter: Michel Ducreux
Session: Poster session 22
1618P - Durable efficacy of zenocutuzumab, a HER2 x HER3 bispecific antibody, in advanced NRG1 fusion positive (NRG1+) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
Presenter: Alison Schram
Session: Poster session 22
1620P - A phase II study of perioperative nalirifox in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (rPDAC): Survival update and biomarkers analysis of the NITRO trial
Presenter: Davide Melisi
Session: Poster session 22
1621P - Efficacy and safety of erdafitinib in adults with pancreatic cancer and prespecified fibroblast growth factor receptor alterations (FGFRalt) in the phase II open-label: Single-arm RAGNAR trial
Presenter: Shubham Pant
Session: Poster session 22
1622P - D-1553 in patients with KRAS G12C mutated advanced pancreatic cancer (pca)
Presenter: Shunsuke Kondo
Session: Poster session 22
1623P - Pelareorep (pela) + atezolizumab (atezo) and chemotherapy in first-line (1L) advanced or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients: Results from the GOBLET study
Presenter: Dirk Arnold
Session: Poster session 22