Abstract 1193P
Background
Currently availbale preoperative prognostic factors for non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs) still struggle to predict tumor aggressiveness, making an adequate management of these lesions hard to be achieved. Aims of this study were: i) to evaluate treatment appropriateness in patients submitted to surgery for NF-PanNETs, and ii) to investigate preoperative features predicting undertreatment or overtreatment in this setting.
Methods
Patients who underwent curative surgery (R0-R1) for NF-PanNETs at San Raffaele Hospital (2002-2022) were retrospectively analysed. Treatment appropriateness was categorized as appropriate treatment, overtreatment, and undertreatment. The presence of histological features of aggressiveness and the occurrence of disease relapse within one year from surgery were considered to define treatment appropriateness.
Results
Overall, 384 patients were included. Of these, 230 (60%) received an appropriate treatment, 129 (34%) an overtreatment and 25 (6%) an undertreatment. Treatment appropriateness was significantly associated with radiological tumor size (p<0.001), tumor site (p=0.012), surgical technique employed (p<0.001), and year of surgical resection (p<0.001). Surgery performed before 2015 (p<0.001), radiological tumor diameter <25.5mm (p<0.001) and pancreatic body/tail location (p=0.018) were identified as independent predictors of overtreatment. Radiological tumor size was the only independent determinant of undertreatment (p=0.016). Significantly poorer disease-free survival (p<0.001), overall survival (p<0.001) and disease-specific survival (p<0.001) were observed among undertreated patients.
Conclusions
Overtreatment occured in almost one-third of patients undergoing surgery for NF-PanNETs. However, over the last decade, the percentage of appropriately treated patients has been steadily increasing. Surgical management should be carefully considered in presence of lesions located in the pancreatic body-tail and/or measuring <25.5 mm, in order to further improve treatment appropriateness.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1170P - Survival outcome prediction of primary melanoma tumours from histology images using deep learning
Presenter: Céline Bossard
Session: Poster session 13
1171P - Evaluation of the transcriptomic presence of tumor associated antigens (TAAs) from antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) and PD-L1 in melanoma: Options for new clinical opportunities
Presenter: Jorge Bartolome
Session: Poster session 13
1172P - Analysis of the microbiome of metastatic melanoma patients with complete response to immunotherapy
Presenter: Marin Golcic
Session: Poster session 13
1173P - NRAS mutation as an independent prognostic factor for resectable Chinese acral melanoma
Presenter: Yu Xu
Session: Poster session 13
1174P - Sex differences in advanced melanoma in Spain: Results from the prospective real-world study GEM 1801
Presenter: Eva Muñoz Couselo
Session: Poster session 13
1175P - Return to work after neoadjuvant versus adjuvant immunotherapy in stage III melanoma patients
Presenter: Judith Lijnsvelt
Session: Poster session 13
1176P - Planned drug holidays during immunotherapy in advanced and metastatic melanoma patients: A nation-wide study
Presenter: Anna Czarnecka
Session: Poster session 13
1177P - Assessment of tumour burden reduction per photography vs magnetic resonance imaging in patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma receiving sonidegib 200 mg
Presenter: Ralf Gutzmer
Session: Poster session 13
1178P - Melanoma incidence rises for pediatrics: 15-year nationwide retrospective cohort study in Korea (2004-2019)
Presenter: Jisu Oh
Session: Poster session 13
1179P - The underestimated skin cancer risk after liver transplantation: A meta-analysis of 147154 patients
Presenter: Amr Ehab El-Qushayri
Session: Poster session 13