Abstract 1193P
Background
Currently availbale preoperative prognostic factors for non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs) still struggle to predict tumor aggressiveness, making an adequate management of these lesions hard to be achieved. Aims of this study were: i) to evaluate treatment appropriateness in patients submitted to surgery for NF-PanNETs, and ii) to investigate preoperative features predicting undertreatment or overtreatment in this setting.
Methods
Patients who underwent curative surgery (R0-R1) for NF-PanNETs at San Raffaele Hospital (2002-2022) were retrospectively analysed. Treatment appropriateness was categorized as appropriate treatment, overtreatment, and undertreatment. The presence of histological features of aggressiveness and the occurrence of disease relapse within one year from surgery were considered to define treatment appropriateness.
Results
Overall, 384 patients were included. Of these, 230 (60%) received an appropriate treatment, 129 (34%) an overtreatment and 25 (6%) an undertreatment. Treatment appropriateness was significantly associated with radiological tumor size (p<0.001), tumor site (p=0.012), surgical technique employed (p<0.001), and year of surgical resection (p<0.001). Surgery performed before 2015 (p<0.001), radiological tumor diameter <25.5mm (p<0.001) and pancreatic body/tail location (p=0.018) were identified as independent predictors of overtreatment. Radiological tumor size was the only independent determinant of undertreatment (p=0.016). Significantly poorer disease-free survival (p<0.001), overall survival (p<0.001) and disease-specific survival (p<0.001) were observed among undertreated patients.
Conclusions
Overtreatment occured in almost one-third of patients undergoing surgery for NF-PanNETs. However, over the last decade, the percentage of appropriately treated patients has been steadily increasing. Surgical management should be carefully considered in presence of lesions located in the pancreatic body-tail and/or measuring <25.5 mm, in order to further improve treatment appropriateness.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1198P - Phase Ib portion of the ACTION-1 phase Ib/3 trial of RYZ101 in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) progressing after 177Lu somatostatin analogue (SSA) therapy: Safety and efficacy findings
Presenter: Jonathan Strosberg
Session: Poster session 13
1199P - MAVERIC: Phase II randomized study of everolimus as maintenance therapy for metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (mNEN) with pulmonary or gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) origin. Results on behalf of the GOIRC
Presenter: Lorenzo Antonuzzo
Session: Poster session 13
1200P - A phase II single-arm interventional trial evaluating the activity and safety of CABOzantinib (CBZ) plus TEMozolomide (TMZ) in lung and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) progressed after SSA therapy, everolimus, sunitinib or PRRT: CABOTEM Trial
Presenter: oOttavia Clemente
Session: Poster session 13
1201P - Evaluation of efficacy TEMCAP regiment as first-line or further line therapy in patients with advanced, unresectable, progressive GEP-NET. Real-world data
Presenter: Agnieszka Kolasinska-Cwikla
Session: Poster session 13
1202P - Final analysis of TENEC trial: A phase II trial of temozolomide (TMZ) as second-line treatment for advanced neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) in patients (pts) with a poor performance status (PS)
Presenter: Claudia von Arx
Session: Poster session 13