Abstract 1943P
Background
RLPS and RLMS are not sensitive to conventional chemotherapy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of eribulin plus anlotinib and camrelizumab for RLMS and RLPS.
Methods
Patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic RLPS or RLMS treated with eribulin plus anlotinib and camrelizumab (Q3W) at Peking University Cancer Hospital Sarcoma Center were included in this retrospective analysis. Response (RECIST v1.1) was evaluated every 3 treatment cycles. Adverse event severity was graded per CTCAE v5.0.
Results
From December 17, 2020 to November 18, 2022, 60 pts (27 male; 33 female) were included. 22 pts had RLMS; RLPS subtypes were well-differentiated (n=9), de-differentiated (n=24), and myxoid (MLPS; n=5). Eribulin was given to 21 pts (35%) at 0.7–1.1 mg/m2, and 39 (65%) at 1.1–1.4 mg/m2.5 pts (RLMS, n=2; RLPS, n=3) were excluded from efficacy analyses due to drug intolerance and the COVID-19 pandemic. After a median of 5 cycles (range, 2–21), a partial response was observed in 15 pts (27.3%), stable disease in 27 (49.1%) and progressive disease in 13 (23.6%). The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 27.3% and 76.4%, respectively. ORR and DCR in pts with RLMS were 42.1% and 84.2%, respectively; in pts with RLPS, they were 19.4% and 72.2%, respectively. After a median follow up of 11.3 months (mo), 10 pts had complete resection, 2 of whom had pathological complete response (1 with RLMS and 1 with MLPS); 3 other pts had locoregional recurrence after surgery. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) for the remaining 45 pts was 5.8 mo; mPFS for RLPS and RLMS subgroups were 5.5 and 6.2 mo, respectively. Any-grade treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 51/60 pts (85.0%), with 22 (36.7%) experiencing grade ≥3 TRAEs. The most common TRAEs were neutropenia (58.3%), proteinuria (23.3%) and anorexia (23.3%). Due to AEs, 15 pts (25.0%) discontinued treatment and 6 (16.7%) reduced their eribulin dose.
Conclusions
Eribulin plus anlotinib and camrelizumab demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy and a manageable safety profile in pts with advanced or metastatic RLPS or RLMS, especially in those with RLMS.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1971P - Metastatic osteosarcoma, patterns of care and outcomes of patients in a real-life setting: The Metabone national observational study
Presenter: Mathilde Reich
Session: Poster session 15
1972P - Molecular mechanism study of recurrence/metastasis for Enneking IIb osteosarcoma
Presenter: Junqiang Yin
Session: Poster session 15
1975P - Systemic therapy for KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GIST
Presenter: Mehdi Brahmi
Session: Poster session 15
1976P - Financial difficulties experienced by gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients in the Netherlands: Data from a cross-sectional multicenter study
Presenter: Deborah van de Wal
Session: Poster session 15
1977P - A registry-based analysis of the projected genomic landscape among unclassified KIT/PDGFRA wildtype mutations in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors
Presenter: Jerry Call
Session: Poster session 15
1978P - Identification of SDH-deficient GIST increases after the implementation of diagnostic algorithm in Life Raft Group (LRG) patient registry data
Presenter: Denisse Evans
Session: Poster session 15
1979P - phase I trial of pembrolizumab in HIV-associated Kaposi sarcoma (KS)
Presenter: Kathryn Lurain
Session: Poster session 15
1980P - Artificial intelligence analysis shows enhanced CCNG1 expression in sarcoma tumors, a novel biomarker for DeltaRex-G tumor targeted retrovector encoding a CCNG1 inhibitor gene
Presenter: Sant Chawla
Session: Poster session 15
1981P - Histopathological diagnostic discrepancies in bone and soft tissue tumors referred to a specialist sarcoma center and its clinical impact
Presenter: Akira Kawai
Session: Poster session 15