Abstract 1943P
Background
RLPS and RLMS are not sensitive to conventional chemotherapy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of eribulin plus anlotinib and camrelizumab for RLMS and RLPS.
Methods
Patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic RLPS or RLMS treated with eribulin plus anlotinib and camrelizumab (Q3W) at Peking University Cancer Hospital Sarcoma Center were included in this retrospective analysis. Response (RECIST v1.1) was evaluated every 3 treatment cycles. Adverse event severity was graded per CTCAE v5.0.
Results
From December 17, 2020 to November 18, 2022, 60 pts (27 male; 33 female) were included. 22 pts had RLMS; RLPS subtypes were well-differentiated (n=9), de-differentiated (n=24), and myxoid (MLPS; n=5). Eribulin was given to 21 pts (35%) at 0.7–1.1 mg/m2, and 39 (65%) at 1.1–1.4 mg/m2.5 pts (RLMS, n=2; RLPS, n=3) were excluded from efficacy analyses due to drug intolerance and the COVID-19 pandemic. After a median of 5 cycles (range, 2–21), a partial response was observed in 15 pts (27.3%), stable disease in 27 (49.1%) and progressive disease in 13 (23.6%). The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 27.3% and 76.4%, respectively. ORR and DCR in pts with RLMS were 42.1% and 84.2%, respectively; in pts with RLPS, they were 19.4% and 72.2%, respectively. After a median follow up of 11.3 months (mo), 10 pts had complete resection, 2 of whom had pathological complete response (1 with RLMS and 1 with MLPS); 3 other pts had locoregional recurrence after surgery. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) for the remaining 45 pts was 5.8 mo; mPFS for RLPS and RLMS subgroups were 5.5 and 6.2 mo, respectively. Any-grade treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 51/60 pts (85.0%), with 22 (36.7%) experiencing grade ≥3 TRAEs. The most common TRAEs were neutropenia (58.3%), proteinuria (23.3%) and anorexia (23.3%). Due to AEs, 15 pts (25.0%) discontinued treatment and 6 (16.7%) reduced their eribulin dose.
Conclusions
Eribulin plus anlotinib and camrelizumab demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy and a manageable safety profile in pts with advanced or metastatic RLPS or RLMS, especially in those with RLMS.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1960P - Clinical outcomes of the patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma developed brain metastasis
Presenter: Yu Toda
Session: Poster session 15
1961P - Prevalence of diagnostic discrepancies in soft tissue and bone tumors from initial diagnosis to referral center
Presenter: Khomsit Thongthammachat
Session: Poster session 15
1963P - Comprehensive profiling of chordoma reveals tumor microenvironment subtypes and unique molecular findings
Presenter: Marina Voropaeva
Session: Poster session 15
1964P - Biomimetics of three-dimensional (3D) osteosarcoma (OS) models: A scoping review
Presenter: Vinesh Sandhu
Session: Poster session 15
1965P - Transcriptional analysis of immune microenvironment of chordomas of the skull base and mobile spine
Presenter: Jason Roszik
Session: Poster session 15
1966P - Extending the interval of denosumab treatment for unresectable giant cell tumor of bone
Presenter: Toshiyuki Kunisada
Session: Poster session 15
1967P - A single-arm multicenter trial of the combination of anlotinib with chemotherapy in patients with stage IIb classic osteosarcoma of the extremity
Presenter: Fan Tang
Session: Poster session 15
1968P - Metastatic Ewing sarcoma, patterns of care and outcomes of patients in a real-life setting: The Metabone national observational study
Presenter: coline ducrot
Session: Poster session 15
1969P - Intratumoral immune infiltrates in chondrosarcoma (ChS)
Presenter: Piotr Rutkowski
Session: Poster session 15
1970P - Metastatic chondrosarcoma, patterns of care and outcomes of patients in a real-life setting: The Metabone national observational study
Presenter: coline ducrot
Session: Poster session 15