Abstract 1377P
Background
EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations (EGFRex20ins) can be classified as near-loop and far-loop based on their location. The underlying structural difference between near- vs. far-loop EGFRex20ins and its impact on various other novel EGFR TKIs response are not well understood.
Methods
We assessed in vitro activity of multiple EGFR TKIs against a panel of BaF3 cells expressing EGFRex20ins mutations. Molecular Dynamics (MD) modeling of near- vs. far-loop EGFRex20ins, with and without binding of EGFR TKIs was performed. Clinical responses (tumor size reduction and progression free survival) were analyzed by near- vs. far-loop insertion location in ZENITH20 and EXCLAIM trials.
Results
In vitro testing with different EGFRex20ins indicated a favorable IC50 for afatinib, CLN-081, and poziotinib in near-loop (A767-P772) versus far-loop (H773-R776) insertions, whereas mobocertinib had similar IC50 values in near- and far-loop insertions. MD modeling using free-energy calculations indicated that wildtype EGFR displayed distinct inactive and active states with a relatively high transitional energy barrier. In comparison, the near-loop (S768insSVD) exhibited multiple states separated by shallow barriers whereas the far-loop (H773insNPH) was conformationally more rigid. The differential p-loop orientation change in near- vs. far-loop insertions played an active role in TKI binding, stabilization, and selectivity. Clinical data supported the in vitro differential impact of insertion location. In the ZENITH20 trial (n=82), in pre-treated EGFRex20ins lung cancer patients, poziotinib had superior activity in near-loop than far-loop tumors both on tumor size reduction (-25.9% vs. -9.8%, p=0.0014) and PFS (11.1 vs. 3.5 months, Log Rank p=0.016). In the EXCLAIM trial platinum-pretreated patients (n=76), mobocertinib demonstrated robust activity in both groups as assessed by tumor size reduction (near -38.5% vs. far -34.1%, p=0.59) and PFS (12.0 vs. 13.0, Log Rank p=0.99).
Conclusions
Preclinical and clinical data indicated that near- vs far-loop EGFRex20 insertions differentially impact sensitivity to individual TKIs. Thus, knowledge of insertion location may allow for more effectively tailored TKI therapy.
Clinical trial identification
ZENITH20: NCT03318939; EXCLAIM: NCT02716116.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Damon Runyon Foundation.
Disclosure
X. Le: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Merck KGaA, Spectrum Pharmaceutics, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Hengrui, Janssen, Blueprint, Daiichi Sankyo, Regeneron, ArriVent, Abion, Pinetree Therapeutics, AbbVie; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Regeneron, Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Arrivent; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Teligene. J.P. Robichaux: Financial Interests, Personal, Affiliate: AstraZeneca. G. Bhat, F. Lebel: Financial Interests, Personal, Affiliate: Spectrum. S. Vincent, V. Bunn, Z. Su: Financial Interests, Personal, Affiliate: Takeda. J. Heymach: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Genentech, Mirati Therapeutics, Eli Lilly & Co., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, BerGenBio, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Curio Science, Novartis, AstraZeneca, BioAlta, Sanofi, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Spectrum; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: MD Anderson Cancer Center; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, International PI for clinical trials: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, International PI for two clinical trials: Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Developed a drug: Spectrum; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Takeda. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1433P - CNS efficacy of atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and actionable mutations
Presenter: Marcus Rathbone
Session: Poster session 20
1434P - Machine learning features derived from spatial interaction of immune cell families are associated with survival in NSCLC patients post-immunotherapy
Presenter: sara arabyarmohammadi
Session: Poster session 20
1435P - Clinical and molecular study with digital support of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: SNF-CLIMEDIN, a prospective randomized Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) study: Interim analysis
Presenter: Helena Linardou
Session: Poster session 20
1436P - Prospective study utilizing ctDNA genome-wide copy number variations for longitudinal monitoring of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Pengkai Han
Session: Poster session 20
1437P - Clinical and economic burden of tissue re-biopsy (TRB) vs. tissue followed by liquid biopsy (TFLB) in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) patients
Presenter: Nicole Engel-Nitz
Session: Poster session 20
1438P - Cemiplimab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Squamous subgroup analysis for EMPOWER-Lung 1 and 3
Presenter: Tamta Makharadze
Session: Poster session 20
1440P - Final top-line results of the BGBC008 phase II, multicenter study of bemcentinib and pembrolizumab (bem+pembro) in second-line (2L) advanced non-squamous (NS) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (NCT03184571)
Presenter: Enriqueta Felip
Session: Poster session 20
1441P - Atezolizumab and bevacizumab (atezo + bev) ± radiotherapy (RT) vs docetaxel (doc) in checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)–experienced metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC): Results from the phase Ib/II MORPHEUS-lung study
Presenter: Francois Ghiringhelli
Session: Poster session 20