Abstract 1377P
Background
EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations (EGFRex20ins) can be classified as near-loop and far-loop based on their location. The underlying structural difference between near- vs. far-loop EGFRex20ins and its impact on various other novel EGFR TKIs response are not well understood.
Methods
We assessed in vitro activity of multiple EGFR TKIs against a panel of BaF3 cells expressing EGFRex20ins mutations. Molecular Dynamics (MD) modeling of near- vs. far-loop EGFRex20ins, with and without binding of EGFR TKIs was performed. Clinical responses (tumor size reduction and progression free survival) were analyzed by near- vs. far-loop insertion location in ZENITH20 and EXCLAIM trials.
Results
In vitro testing with different EGFRex20ins indicated a favorable IC50 for afatinib, CLN-081, and poziotinib in near-loop (A767-P772) versus far-loop (H773-R776) insertions, whereas mobocertinib had similar IC50 values in near- and far-loop insertions. MD modeling using free-energy calculations indicated that wildtype EGFR displayed distinct inactive and active states with a relatively high transitional energy barrier. In comparison, the near-loop (S768insSVD) exhibited multiple states separated by shallow barriers whereas the far-loop (H773insNPH) was conformationally more rigid. The differential p-loop orientation change in near- vs. far-loop insertions played an active role in TKI binding, stabilization, and selectivity. Clinical data supported the in vitro differential impact of insertion location. In the ZENITH20 trial (n=82), in pre-treated EGFRex20ins lung cancer patients, poziotinib had superior activity in near-loop than far-loop tumors both on tumor size reduction (-25.9% vs. -9.8%, p=0.0014) and PFS (11.1 vs. 3.5 months, Log Rank p=0.016). In the EXCLAIM trial platinum-pretreated patients (n=76), mobocertinib demonstrated robust activity in both groups as assessed by tumor size reduction (near -38.5% vs. far -34.1%, p=0.59) and PFS (12.0 vs. 13.0, Log Rank p=0.99).
Conclusions
Preclinical and clinical data indicated that near- vs far-loop EGFRex20 insertions differentially impact sensitivity to individual TKIs. Thus, knowledge of insertion location may allow for more effectively tailored TKI therapy.
Clinical trial identification
ZENITH20: NCT03318939; EXCLAIM: NCT02716116.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Damon Runyon Foundation.
Disclosure
X. Le: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Merck KGaA, Spectrum Pharmaceutics, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Hengrui, Janssen, Blueprint, Daiichi Sankyo, Regeneron, ArriVent, Abion, Pinetree Therapeutics, AbbVie; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Regeneron, Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Arrivent; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Teligene. J.P. Robichaux: Financial Interests, Personal, Affiliate: AstraZeneca. G. Bhat, F. Lebel: Financial Interests, Personal, Affiliate: Spectrum. S. Vincent, V. Bunn, Z. Su: Financial Interests, Personal, Affiliate: Takeda. J. Heymach: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Genentech, Mirati Therapeutics, Eli Lilly & Co., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, BerGenBio, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Curio Science, Novartis, AstraZeneca, BioAlta, Sanofi, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Spectrum; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: MD Anderson Cancer Center; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, International PI for clinical trials: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, International PI for two clinical trials: Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Developed a drug: Spectrum; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Takeda. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1368P - LUMINATE 102: A real-world study on biomarker testing rates among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) across lines of therapy
Presenter: Charu Aggarwal
Session: Poster session 20
1369P - BrigAlec study: Focus on alectinib efficacy after brigatinib exposure in BrigALK2 study (GFPC 02-2019)
Presenter: Renaud Descourt
Session: Poster session 20
1370P - Efficacy and safety of ensartinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: A multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study
Presenter: Jianhua Chang
Session: Poster session 20
1371P - First-line alectinib vs. brigatinib in advanced metastatic NSCLC with ALK rearrangement: Real-world data
Presenter: Young Kyung Jeon
Session: Poster session 20
1372P - Repotrectinib in patients (pts) with NTRK fusion-positive (NTRK+) advanced solid tumors, including NSCLC: Update from the phase I/II TRIDENT-1 trial
Presenter: Ben Solomon
Session: Poster session 20
1373P - Efficacy and safety of taletrectinib in patients (Pts) with ROS1+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Interim analysis of global TRUST-II study
Presenter: Maurice Pérol
Session: Poster session 20
1374P - Survival and therapy analysis of small-scale ROS1-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients
Presenter: Moritz Glaser
Session: Poster session 20
1375P - Beamion Lung 1, an ongoing phase Ia/Ib trial of the HER2 TKI, BI 1810631 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors with HER2 aberrations: Latest data
Presenter: Frans Opdam
Session: Poster session 20
1378P - Efficacy and safety of tunlametinib (HL-085) combined with vemurafenib in patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutated solid tumors: A multicenter, phase I study
Presenter: Yuan-Kai Shi
Session: Poster session 20
1379P - Preliminary results of phase II KUNPENG study of vebreltinib in patients (Pts) with advanced NSCLC harboring c-MET alterations
Presenter: Jin-Ji Yang
Session: Poster session 20