Abstract 1377P
Background
EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations (EGFRex20ins) can be classified as near-loop and far-loop based on their location. The underlying structural difference between near- vs. far-loop EGFRex20ins and its impact on various other novel EGFR TKIs response are not well understood.
Methods
We assessed in vitro activity of multiple EGFR TKIs against a panel of BaF3 cells expressing EGFRex20ins mutations. Molecular Dynamics (MD) modeling of near- vs. far-loop EGFRex20ins, with and without binding of EGFR TKIs was performed. Clinical responses (tumor size reduction and progression free survival) were analyzed by near- vs. far-loop insertion location in ZENITH20 and EXCLAIM trials.
Results
In vitro testing with different EGFRex20ins indicated a favorable IC50 for afatinib, CLN-081, and poziotinib in near-loop (A767-P772) versus far-loop (H773-R776) insertions, whereas mobocertinib had similar IC50 values in near- and far-loop insertions. MD modeling using free-energy calculations indicated that wildtype EGFR displayed distinct inactive and active states with a relatively high transitional energy barrier. In comparison, the near-loop (S768insSVD) exhibited multiple states separated by shallow barriers whereas the far-loop (H773insNPH) was conformationally more rigid. The differential p-loop orientation change in near- vs. far-loop insertions played an active role in TKI binding, stabilization, and selectivity. Clinical data supported the in vitro differential impact of insertion location. In the ZENITH20 trial (n=82), in pre-treated EGFRex20ins lung cancer patients, poziotinib had superior activity in near-loop than far-loop tumors both on tumor size reduction (-25.9% vs. -9.8%, p=0.0014) and PFS (11.1 vs. 3.5 months, Log Rank p=0.016). In the EXCLAIM trial platinum-pretreated patients (n=76), mobocertinib demonstrated robust activity in both groups as assessed by tumor size reduction (near -38.5% vs. far -34.1%, p=0.59) and PFS (12.0 vs. 13.0, Log Rank p=0.99).
Conclusions
Preclinical and clinical data indicated that near- vs far-loop EGFRex20 insertions differentially impact sensitivity to individual TKIs. Thus, knowledge of insertion location may allow for more effectively tailored TKI therapy.
Clinical trial identification
ZENITH20: NCT03318939; EXCLAIM: NCT02716116.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Damon Runyon Foundation.
Disclosure
X. Le: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Merck KGaA, Spectrum Pharmaceutics, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Hengrui, Janssen, Blueprint, Daiichi Sankyo, Regeneron, ArriVent, Abion, Pinetree Therapeutics, AbbVie; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Regeneron, Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Arrivent; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Teligene. J.P. Robichaux: Financial Interests, Personal, Affiliate: AstraZeneca. G. Bhat, F. Lebel: Financial Interests, Personal, Affiliate: Spectrum. S. Vincent, V. Bunn, Z. Su: Financial Interests, Personal, Affiliate: Takeda. J. Heymach: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Genentech, Mirati Therapeutics, Eli Lilly & Co., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, BerGenBio, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Curio Science, Novartis, AstraZeneca, BioAlta, Sanofi, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Spectrum; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: MD Anderson Cancer Center; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, International PI for clinical trials: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, International PI for two clinical trials: Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Developed a drug: Spectrum; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Takeda. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1380P - Treatment (Tx) sequencing with tepotinib in previously treated patients (pts) with MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping NSCLC in the VISION trial
Presenter: Santiago Viteri
Session: Poster session 20
1381P - TOGETHER: Pooled real-world datasets of METex14 skipping NSCLC and adjusted comparison of upfront (chemo-)immunotherapy with tepotinib from VISION
Presenter: Petros Christopoulos
Session: Poster session 20
1382P - Liquid biopsies (LBx) and tissue biopsies (TBx) for identifying MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping in advanced NSCLC: Analyses from the phase II VISION study of tepotinib
Presenter: Christian Rolfo
Session: Poster session 20
1383P - Efficacy of capmatinib compared to standard of care for German patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring METex14 mutations: Results from the RECAP study
Presenter: Anna Kron
Session: Poster session 20
1384P - Phase II study of cabozantinib in patients with MET-altered lung cancers
Presenter: Guilherme Harada
Session: Poster session 20
1385P - Genomics of early progression on selpercatinib in patients with RET fusion-positive lung cancers
Presenter: Monica Chen
Session: Poster session 20
1386P - Validation of MET amplification using next-generation sequencing in lung adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Marta Salido
Session: Poster session 20
1387P - Efficacy of first-line treatment options in advanced HER2-altered non-small cell lung cancer: A multi-center retrospective study
Presenter: haifeng sun
Session: Poster session 20
1388P - Real-world prognostic value of RET fusions in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC)
Presenter: Shirish Gadgeel
Session: Poster session 20
1390P - Real-world characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with advanced HER2/ERBB2-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in France and Germany
Presenter: Petros Christopoulos
Session: Poster session 20