Abstract 1120P
Background
The introduction of adjuvant systemic treatment for patients with high-risk melanoma has increased the importance of adequate melanoma staging. However, inconsistencies in outcomes between disease stages exist, as an increase in stage does not necessarily correspond to improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) or melanoma-specific survival (MSS). Therefore, there is a need for a tool that can predict patient-specific outcomes rather than grouping patients according to outcome.
Methods
A total of 4071 patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy between 1997 and 2013 in four European melanoma centers were included in the development cohort. A prognostic model and nomogram were developed to predict recurrence and melanoma-specific mortality (MSM) on a continuous scale in patients with >pT1a melanomas. From this model, individual values for RFS and MSS were derived. For the purpose of external validation, a cohort consisting of 4822 patients was provided by the Melanoma Institute of Australia. Model performance was assessed by discrimination (C-index) and calibration.
Results
The prediction model for recurrence and MSM contained six prognostic factors: positive sentinel node (SN) status, Breslow depth, ulceration, age, location and SN tumor burden. The C-index for the recurrence model was 0.76, and was 0.79 for the MSM model. External validation showed good calibration for both outcomes with a C-index of 0.74 for recurrence and 0.76 for MSM.
Conclusions
This EORTC-MIA prediction model and nomogram provides patient-specific risk probabilities for recurrence and MSM and consequently RFS and MSS using only readily-available variables. The nomogram can support clinical decision-making for adjuvant treatment in patients with high-risk melanomas.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
A.A.M. Van der Veldt: Financial Interests, Institutional, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: BMS, MSD, Merck, Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Pierre Fabre, Ipsen, Eisai. J. Thompson: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, MSD, GSK, Provectus; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, travel & conference support: GSK, Provectus, Novartis. P. Rutkowski: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, honoraria for lectures: MSD, BMS, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, BMS, Pierre Fabre, Merck, Sanofi, Blueprint Medicines, Philogen; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Merck, Sanofi, Novartis, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, research grant for ISS: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding, research grant for institution: BMS; Non-Financial Interests, Member of Board of Directors: Polish Society of Surgical Oncology; Non-Financial Interests, Member of Board of Directors, President: Polish Oncological Society. A.C.J. van Akkooi: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, MSD - Merck, Merck-Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Sirius Medical, 4SC, Provectus; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, NIVEC study: Amgen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Merck-Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1109P - Second-line pembrolizumab (pembro) in Chinese patients (pts) with advanced melanoma: Long-term follow-up of the phase I KEYNOTE-151 study
Presenter: Lu Si
Session: Poster session 13
1110P - A phase II clinical trial of SHR-1701 combined with temozolomide for advanced melanoma
Presenter: Tu Hu
Session: Poster session 13
1111P - A randomised phase II study of intermittent versus continuous dosing of targeted therapy in patients with BRAFV600 mutant advanced melanoma (INTERIM)
Presenter: Avinash Gupta
Session: Poster session 13
1112P - Five-year survival after intermittent targeted therapy and anti-PD1 in stage IV melanoma: An update of the IMPemBra trial
Presenter: Lotte Hoeijmakers
Session: Poster session 13
1113P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (enco) + binimetinib (bini) vs vemurafenib (vemu) or enco in patients (pts) with BRAF V600–mutant melanoma
Presenter: Dirk Schadendorf
Session: Poster session 13
1114P - Encorafenib (E) plus binimetinib (B) in unresectable advanced or metastatic BRAFV600-mut melanoma, real-world evidence in Spain (GEM 2002 - BECARE)
Presenter: Ainara Soria Rivas
Session: Poster session 13
1115P - Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of dabrafenib/trametinib versus vemurafenib/cobimetinib therapy in routine medical practice: Eight years of BRAF/MEK inhibitor use in routine clinical practice
Presenter: Karolina Piejko
Session: Poster session 13
1116P - Long term outcome of complete responders to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or target therapy (TT) in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Celine Boutros
Session: Poster session 13
1117P - Overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma treated with encorafenib plus binimetinib (ENCO+BINI): Comparing real-world vs clinical trial data
Presenter: Gino In
Session: Poster session 13
1118P - Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with BRAF+ metastatic melanoma refractory to first-line immunotherapy
Presenter: Thach-Giao Truong
Session: Poster session 13