Abstract 449P
Background
CDK4/6i plus ET is the standard of care for HR-positive HER2-negative mBC. The trials that led to this combination approval included mainly patients (pts) with ductal breast cancer, while limited data are reported on LBC. However, LBC are characterised by a unique pattern of metastatic recurrence and different degrees of endocrine sensitivity. This study aims to analyse CDK4/6i combinations on mLBC pts survival outcomes.
Methods
In this retrospective cohort study, we analysed outcome data of pts with mLBC who received CDK4/6i plus ET as first-line treatment between January 2017 and December 2022. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate median progression-free survival (mPFS). Long-rank Mantel-Cox test was used to evaluate differences in outcomes between different subgroups and between drugs.
Results
The study included 30 pts with a median age at mBC diagnosis of 63.1 years. 8/30 (27%) pts had de-novo metastasis, and 22/30 (73%) had recurrent disease. As CDK4/6i, 13/30 (43%) pts received Palbociclib (P), 14/30 (47%) Ribociclib (R) and 3/30 (10%) Abemaciclib. As ET, 13/30 (43%) pts received Fulvestrant (F) and 17/30 (57%) Letrozole (L). The overall mPFS was 28.7 months (mos). There were no statistically significant differences in mPFS between pts treated with R vs P (29.5 vs 23.7 mos, HR 0.82 [0.31-2.21], p=0.7). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in pts with de-novo metastasis vs recurrent disease (29.5 vs 23.8 mos, HR 0.59 [0.20-1.74], p=0.3), and in pts with only-bone vs visceral metastasis (23.9 vs 28.7 mos, HR 0.92 [0.33-2.54], p=0.9). In line with the different endocrine sensitivity of the two groups, a much longer mPFS, even if not statistically different, was observed in pts treated with L vs F (35.1 vs 15.1 mos, HR 0.56 [0.20-1.57], p=0.2). A statistically significant difference was observed in mPFS of HER2-0 vs HER2-low LBC pts (29.5 vs 5.9 mos, HR 0.20 [0.05-0.79], p=0.02).
Conclusions
CDK4/6i plus ET is an effective treatment in pts with mLBC. However, there is a significant difference in clinical outcomes of pts with a HER2-0 vs HER2-low mLBC. This suggests that further research is needed to identify new biomarkers for a more tailored treatment choice in pts with LBC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
C. von Arx: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Receipt of consultation fees:Participation in a company sponsored speaker’s bureau: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pierre-Fabre, Gentili, Lilly, Novartis, Ipsen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Conference Fee and travel grant: Organon; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Conference fee and travel grant: AAA. V. Di Lauro: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Honoraria: Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, Roche, Gentili, Genetic, Exact Sciences, Pierre Fabre, Epionpharma.. R. Caputo: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Honoraria or speakers’ fee: AstraZeneca, Daiichi- Sankyo, Gilead, Veracyte, Pfizer, MSD, Seagen. . G. Buono: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Honoraria and speakers fee: Pierre Fabre, Novartis, GSK, Eli-Lilly, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Exact Science, Genetic. A. Verrazzo: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Travel Grant: Pierre Fabre. F. Nuzzo: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker: Istituto Gentili and Pfizer.. M. De Laurentiis: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Honoraria and speakers fee: Pierre Fabre, Eli Lilly, Menarini, Gilead, Roche, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, Seagen, Daiichi Sankyo, Genetic, GSK, Exact Sciences, Tomalab, Eisai, MSD, Sanofi Genzyme. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1301P - A prognostic clinical and circulating biomarker model to identify futile chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) in stage III NSCLC
Presenter: Rianne Vaes
Session: Poster session 04
1302P - Treatment outcomes and safety of durvalumab following definitive chemoradiotherapy among patients with stage III NSCLC in Thai populations: A real-world, multi-center observational study
Presenter: Piyada Sitthideatphaiboon
Session: Poster session 04
1303P - Immune-modulating effects on tumor draining lymph nodes following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in patients with T3-4N0-1 NSCLC
Presenter: Ezgi Ulas
Session: Poster session 04
1304P - A structured multidisciplinary approach for diagnosing immune-related pneumonitis in patients undergoing adjuvant durvalumab for stage III non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Illaa Smesseim
Session: Poster session 04
1305P - Importance of the resected lung tumor specimen in patients with locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer undergoing prior targeted therapy
Presenter: Jeong Uk Lim
Session: Poster session 04
1307P - The Biocartis Idylla GeneFusion Assay (RUO) for lung cancer testing: The experience of testing over 5000 tumours in routine practice
Presenter: Lee Robertson
Session: Poster session 04
1308P - Diameter threshold for lung nodules at low-dose CT screening: Chinese population screening experience
Presenter: YE WENJUN
Session: Poster session 04
1309P - Immune exhaustion in tumor-free lymph nodes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is associated with performance status and survival
Presenter: Laura Sellmer
Session: Poster session 04
1310P - Loratadine: A potential game-changer in lung cancer treatment with improved survival outcomes
Presenter: Xiwen Liu
Session: Poster session 04
1311P - Understanding the basis for intrinsic resistance to KRASG12C inhibitors
Presenter: Alba Santos Ramos
Session: Poster session 04