Abstract 449P
Background
CDK4/6i plus ET is the standard of care for HR-positive HER2-negative mBC. The trials that led to this combination approval included mainly patients (pts) with ductal breast cancer, while limited data are reported on LBC. However, LBC are characterised by a unique pattern of metastatic recurrence and different degrees of endocrine sensitivity. This study aims to analyse CDK4/6i combinations on mLBC pts survival outcomes.
Methods
In this retrospective cohort study, we analysed outcome data of pts with mLBC who received CDK4/6i plus ET as first-line treatment between January 2017 and December 2022. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate median progression-free survival (mPFS). Long-rank Mantel-Cox test was used to evaluate differences in outcomes between different subgroups and between drugs.
Results
The study included 30 pts with a median age at mBC diagnosis of 63.1 years. 8/30 (27%) pts had de-novo metastasis, and 22/30 (73%) had recurrent disease. As CDK4/6i, 13/30 (43%) pts received Palbociclib (P), 14/30 (47%) Ribociclib (R) and 3/30 (10%) Abemaciclib. As ET, 13/30 (43%) pts received Fulvestrant (F) and 17/30 (57%) Letrozole (L). The overall mPFS was 28.7 months (mos). There were no statistically significant differences in mPFS between pts treated with R vs P (29.5 vs 23.7 mos, HR 0.82 [0.31-2.21], p=0.7). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in pts with de-novo metastasis vs recurrent disease (29.5 vs 23.8 mos, HR 0.59 [0.20-1.74], p=0.3), and in pts with only-bone vs visceral metastasis (23.9 vs 28.7 mos, HR 0.92 [0.33-2.54], p=0.9). In line with the different endocrine sensitivity of the two groups, a much longer mPFS, even if not statistically different, was observed in pts treated with L vs F (35.1 vs 15.1 mos, HR 0.56 [0.20-1.57], p=0.2). A statistically significant difference was observed in mPFS of HER2-0 vs HER2-low LBC pts (29.5 vs 5.9 mos, HR 0.20 [0.05-0.79], p=0.02).
Conclusions
CDK4/6i plus ET is an effective treatment in pts with mLBC. However, there is a significant difference in clinical outcomes of pts with a HER2-0 vs HER2-low mLBC. This suggests that further research is needed to identify new biomarkers for a more tailored treatment choice in pts with LBC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
C. von Arx: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Receipt of consultation fees:Participation in a company sponsored speaker’s bureau: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pierre-Fabre, Gentili, Lilly, Novartis, Ipsen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Conference Fee and travel grant: Organon; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Conference fee and travel grant: AAA. V. Di Lauro: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Honoraria: Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, Roche, Gentili, Genetic, Exact Sciences, Pierre Fabre, Epionpharma.. R. Caputo: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Honoraria or speakers’ fee: AstraZeneca, Daiichi- Sankyo, Gilead, Veracyte, Pfizer, MSD, Seagen. . G. Buono: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Honoraria and speakers fee: Pierre Fabre, Novartis, GSK, Eli-Lilly, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Exact Science, Genetic. A. Verrazzo: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Travel Grant: Pierre Fabre. F. Nuzzo: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker: Istituto Gentili and Pfizer.. M. De Laurentiis: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Honoraria and speakers fee: Pierre Fabre, Eli Lilly, Menarini, Gilead, Roche, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, Seagen, Daiichi Sankyo, Genetic, GSK, Exact Sciences, Tomalab, Eisai, MSD, Sanofi Genzyme. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
457P - Disparities in receipt of CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy as therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the real-world setting
Presenter: Gretchen Kimmick
Session: Poster session 04
458P - Metastatic breast cancer: How and how often do we communicate? Results from an Italian national survey
Presenter: Camilla Lisanti
Session: Poster session 04
460P - Impact of fulvestrant utilization on prognostic outcome among patients with HR+ve/HER2-ve metastatic breast cancer: Results from a real-world dataset
Presenter: Shaheenah Dawood
Session: Poster session 04
462P - Health outcomes of treatment sequences with eribulin or other single agents’ chemotherapy for treating relapsed metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Simone Rivolo
Session: Poster session 04
463P - Impact of two waves of Sars-Cov-2 outbreak on the clinical presentation and outcomes of newly referred breast cancer cases at AP-HP: A retrospective multicenter cohort study
Presenter: Sonia Priou
Session: Poster session 04
464P - Developing a prognostic risk stratification model and treatment options for HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis
Presenter: JiaXin Chen
Session: Poster session 04
465P - Reporting of older subgroups enrolled to registration breast cancer trials, 2012-2021
Presenter: Colm Mac Eochagain
Session: Poster session 04
466P - Integrated analysis of potential prognosis and differential expression between primary and metastatic foci for COL12A1 in breast cancer
Presenter: Lei Tang
Session: Poster session 04