Abstract 635P
Background
Cetuximab could mediate, independently from RAS mutation, an immunogenic tumor cell death and antitumor immune response. This trial explores the efficacy and safety of AVE, CET and IRI for the treatment of refractory MSS mCRC.
Methods
Chemo-refractory (+anti-EGFR refractory if RAS wt) MSS, mCRC patients (pts) were enrolled in 3 cohorts (A: RAS wt, B & C: RAS mut) and treated with CET (500 mg/m2/Q2W), IRI (150 mg/m2/Q2W) and AVE (10 mg/kg/Q2W). Primary endpoints were safety, overall response rate (ORR) (cohorts A-B) and 6 months progression-free survival rate (6m-PFSR) (cohort C). Secondary and exploratory endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), PFS, OS and immunoscore (IS) biomarker. Based on a Simon 2-stage design (α=0.1; β=0.2) for ORR (cohorts A: P0/P1=0.15/0.33 – B: P0/P1=0.09/0.25) and 6m-PFSR (cohort C: P0/P1=0.15/0.31), 10+18 (A); 13+15 (B) and 14+25 (C) pts were needed. At least 2+5 (A); 2+3 (B) and 3+6 (C) pts must reach ORR (A-B) or 6m-PFSR (C) for efficacy objectives. Immunofluorescence (CD3, CD8 densities) was performed on baseline metastasis biopsies to generate IS.
Results
57 pts (median 62 yrs, 73.7% male, 84.2% left-sided, 86.0% synchr. mCRC) were included and 55 pts treated. Any treatment-emergent adverse event (AE) grade >=3 occurred in 35 pts (63.6%; diarrhea in 11 pts, 20.0%). Immune-related AEs grade >=3 appeared in 2 pts (3.6%; 1 acute kidney injury, 1 cholangitis). Efficacy results are summarized.
Table: 635P
Characteristics | Cohort A (n=28) | Cohort B (n=13) | Cohort C (n=14) |
ORR, % (pts) | 21.4% (6/28) | 0.0% (0/13) | 0.0% (0/14) |
DCR, % (pts) | 50.0% (14/28) | 61.5% (8/13) | 42.9% (6/14) |
6m-PFSR, % (pts) | 25.0% (7/28) | 38.5% (5/13) | 7.1% (1/14) |
Median PFS, months (95%CI) | 3.6 (2.5-5.6) | 3.7 (2.7-6.4) | 2.8 (2.4-3.8) |
Median OS, months (95%CI) | 11.4 (5.3-15.6) | 10.1 (6.0-22.8) | 6.8 (5.3-9.7) |
Independently of RAS mutation, high IS was associated with greater tumor shrinkage (OR=8.3, p<0.01), DCR (OR=8.0, p=0.05), PFS (median 7.1 vs 3.1 months; HR=0.29, p<0.01) and OS (median 12.9 vs 7.2 months; HR=0.62, p=0.19).
Conclusions
Despite good tolerability, AVETUXIRI trial did not reach its efficacy endpoint. IS could be a predictive biomarker for selecting patients with potential treatment benefits.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03608046.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Institut Roi Albert II - Cliniques universitaires St-Luc.
Funding
Merck Serono.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
649P - The genomic landscape of appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AA) revealed by 855 whole exome sequences (WES)
Presenter: Michael White
Session: Poster session 11
650P - Genomic profiling of small bowel adenocarcinoma: A pooled analysis
Presenter: Thomas Aparicio
Session: Poster session 11
651P - DCF versus doublet chemotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced squamous anal cell carcinoma: A multicenter propensity score matching study
Presenter: Christophe Borg
Session: Poster session 11
726P - Circulating cell-free DNA-based biomarkers as a new tool for prognosis and surveillance of adrenocortical carcinoma
Presenter: Cristina Ronchi
Session: Poster session 11
727P - Clinical outcome of anlotinib (A) and tislelizumab (T) in metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma(mACC): A one-arm single-center experience
Presenter: HAO LI
Session: Poster session 11
728P - Brain metastases in advanced thyroid carcinoma: Clinical and molecular characteristics and outcomes
Presenter: Thais Megid
Session: Poster session 11
729P - Prognostic significance of nodal micrometastases in patients with non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs): A survival analysis from a prospective observational study
Presenter: Valentina Andreasi
Session: Poster session 11
730P - The outcome of combine radioligand and CAPTEM therapy in patients with advanced, unresectable, progressive GEP-NET
Presenter: Jaroslaw Cwikla
Session: Poster session 11
748P - Outcomes for patients (pts) with advanced endometrial cancer (aEC) who completed pembrolizumab (pembro) and continued lenvatinib (LEN) in the phase III Study 309/KEYNOTE-775
Presenter: Emeline Colombo
Session: Poster session 11