Abstract 1092P
Background
Previous studies demonstrate limited efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with irresectable acral melanoma (AM) compared to cutaneous melanoma (CM) in other locations. However, little is known about the outcomes of adjuvant therapy for resectable stage III-IV AM. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes after treatment with adjuvant anti-PD-1 in resectable stage III-IV AM and compare them to CM.
Methods
All patients with stage III-IV AM and CM who received adjuvant anti-PD-1 after complete resection between 2017 and 2022 were included from the prospective nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. We described baseline characteristics and analyzed the recurrence-free survival (RFS). A multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to account for potential confounders age, performance status (ECOG), AJCC 8th edition disease stage, mutation status. Type of recurrence (locoregional or distant metastases) and toxicity rates will be presented at the conference.
Results
In total, 1977 patients (86 AM and 1891 CM) were included. At baseline, KIT mutations were more common in AM patients. In addition, AM patients more often had higher AJCC 8 disease stages. No other significantly different baseline characteristics were identified. Median follow-up was 16.4 months. The median RFS was 14.8 months (95%CI: 11.5-29.7) for the AM cohort and 37.4 months (95%CI: 32.1 - NR) for the CM cohort (p=.002)). After correcting for potential confounders, AM remained associated with higher risk of recurrence than CM (HRadj 1.55; 95%CI: 1.09-2.19; p=.014). Table: 1092P
Baseline characteristics and median RFS stratified by melanoma type.
AM (n=86) | CM (n=1891) | P-value | ||
Median age (IQR) | 65 [54, 72] | 64 [54, 73] | .984 | |
Gender (n (%) female) | 45 (52.3) | 793 (41.9) | .160 | |
AJCC8 stage (n (%)) | IIIA | 5 (5.7) | 130 (6.9) | .001 |
IIIB | 17 (19.5) | 599 (31.7) | ||
IIIC | 58 (66.7) | 713 (37.7) | ||
IIID | 2 (2.3) | 37 (2.0) | ||
IV | 2 (2.3) | 170 (9.0) | ||
Unknown | 3 (3.4) | 241 (12.8) | ||
Mutation (n (%)) | BRAF | 23 (26.7) | 804 (42.5) | .001 |
NRAS | 9 (10.5) | 441 (23.3) | ||
KIT | 7 (8.1) | 12 (0.6) | ||
Median RFS (months; 95% CI) | 14.8 (11.5-29.3) | 37.4 (32.1-NA) | .002 |
Conclusions
This study suggests that AM patients treated with adjuvant anti-PD-1 have shorter RFS than CM patients receiving the same treatment. Longer follow-up is needed to investigate overall survival and distant-metastasis-free survival.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
J.B.A.G. Haanen: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Bristol Myers Squibb, Achilles Therapeutics, Ipsen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck Serono, Pfizer, Molecular Partners, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Third Rock Venture, Iovance Biotherapeutics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board, SAB member: BioNTech, Immunocore, Gadeta, Instil Bio, PokeAcel, T-Knife; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, SAB member: Neogene Therapeutics, Scenic; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Neogene Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Bristol Myers Squibb, BioNTech US, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Amgen, Novartis, Asher Bio; Non-Financial Interests, Member: ASCO, AACR, SITC; Other, Other, Editorial Board ESMO Open: ESMO; Other, Other, Editor-in-Chief IOTECH: ESMO; Other, Editorial Board: Kidney Cancer. C.U. Blank: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, GSK, AZ, Pfizer, Lilly, GenMab, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Third Rock Ventures; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Immagene; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares, intention to develop IFN signature algorithm: NewCo, no name yet; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: BMS, Novartis, NanoString, 4SC; Other, pending patent: WO 2021/177822 A1. M.J.B. Aarts: Financial Interests, Advisory Board: Amgen, BMS, Novartis, MSD-Merck, Merck-Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Astellas, Bayer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Merck-Pfizer. J.W. de Groot: Financial Interests, Advisory Role: BMS, Pierre Fabre, Servier, MSD, Novartis. G.A.P. Hospers: Financial Interests, Advisory Role: Amgen, BMS, Roche, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: BMS, Seerave. E. Kapiteijn: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Merck, Delcath, Bayer, Lilly; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: BMS, Pierre Fabre, Delcath. R.S. van Rijn: Financial Interests, Advisory Board: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Other, expert meeting fee: Roche. A.A.M. Van der Veldt: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Role: BMS, Roche, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Sanofi, Ipsen, Eisai, Merck; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: MSD. M.J. Boers-Sonderen: Financial Interests, Advisory Role: Pierre Fabre, MSD, Novartis. F. Van Den Eertwegh: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Grant for national trial: Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Grant for research project: BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Research grant for trial: Sanofi, Idera; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Grant for trial: Teva; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role: BMS, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, MSD, Pfizer, Amgen, Ipsen, Merck. K.P.M. Suijkerbuijk: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Novartis, BMS, AbbVie, Pierre Fabre, MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Novartis, TigaTx. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
818TiP - REFRaME-O1/ENGOT-OV79/GOG-3086: A phase II/III open-label study evaluating the efficacy and safety of luveltamab tazevibulin versus investigator’s choice of chemotherapy in women with relapsed platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer expressing folate receptor alpha (FolRα)
Presenter: R. Wendel Naumann
Session: Poster session 12
819TiP - FONTANA: A phase I/IIa study of AZD5335 as monotherapy and in combination with anti-cancer agents in patients with solid tumours
Presenter: Funda Meric-Bernstam
Session: Poster session 12
820TiP - A randomized phase II study of secondary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer who have progressed on PARP inhibitor maintenance (KGOG 3067/SOCCER-P trial)
Presenter: Hyun-woong Cho
Session: Poster session 12
821TiP - Phase I study of ceralasertib (cerala) in combination with AZD5305 in patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic ovarian cancer (OC) previously treated with PARP inhibitors (PARPis)
Presenter: Geoffrey Shapiro
Session: Poster session 12
862P - Clinical utility of circulating tumor HPV16 DNA detection in plasma from oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients
Presenter: Ana Carolina de Carvalho
Session: Poster session 12
863P - Microbiota and cytokines profile in patients (pts) affected by recurrent metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) +/- chemotherapy (CT) and prebiotic inulin in the PRINCESS study
Presenter: Danilo Galizia
Session: Poster session 12
864P - Serial cell-free tumor DNA in prognosing survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with upfront surgery
Presenter: Grégoire Marret
Session: Poster session 12
865P - Molecular analysis of surgical margins in early oral carcinomas (OSCC)
Presenter: Antoine Moya-Plana
Session: Poster session 12
866P - Prognostic performance of a genome-wide methylome enrichment platform in head and neck cancer
Presenter: Geoffrey Liu
Session: Poster session 12
867P - Predicting HPV-association using regular H&E slides can identify subgroups of patients with favorable prognosis at a highly detailed level
Presenter: Jens Peter Klussmann
Session: Poster session 12