Abstract 1092P
Background
Previous studies demonstrate limited efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with irresectable acral melanoma (AM) compared to cutaneous melanoma (CM) in other locations. However, little is known about the outcomes of adjuvant therapy for resectable stage III-IV AM. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes after treatment with adjuvant anti-PD-1 in resectable stage III-IV AM and compare them to CM.
Methods
All patients with stage III-IV AM and CM who received adjuvant anti-PD-1 after complete resection between 2017 and 2022 were included from the prospective nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. We described baseline characteristics and analyzed the recurrence-free survival (RFS). A multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to account for potential confounders age, performance status (ECOG), AJCC 8th edition disease stage, mutation status. Type of recurrence (locoregional or distant metastases) and toxicity rates will be presented at the conference.
Results
In total, 1977 patients (86 AM and 1891 CM) were included. At baseline, KIT mutations were more common in AM patients. In addition, AM patients more often had higher AJCC 8 disease stages. No other significantly different baseline characteristics were identified. Median follow-up was 16.4 months. The median RFS was 14.8 months (95%CI: 11.5-29.7) for the AM cohort and 37.4 months (95%CI: 32.1 - NR) for the CM cohort (p=.002)). After correcting for potential confounders, AM remained associated with higher risk of recurrence than CM (HRadj 1.55; 95%CI: 1.09-2.19; p=.014). Table: 1092P
Baseline characteristics and median RFS stratified by melanoma type.
AM (n=86) | CM (n=1891) | P-value | ||
Median age (IQR) | 65 [54, 72] | 64 [54, 73] | .984 | |
Gender (n (%) female) | 45 (52.3) | 793 (41.9) | .160 | |
AJCC8 stage (n (%)) | IIIA | 5 (5.7) | 130 (6.9) | .001 |
IIIB | 17 (19.5) | 599 (31.7) | ||
IIIC | 58 (66.7) | 713 (37.7) | ||
IIID | 2 (2.3) | 37 (2.0) | ||
IV | 2 (2.3) | 170 (9.0) | ||
Unknown | 3 (3.4) | 241 (12.8) | ||
Mutation (n (%)) | BRAF | 23 (26.7) | 804 (42.5) | .001 |
NRAS | 9 (10.5) | 441 (23.3) | ||
KIT | 7 (8.1) | 12 (0.6) | ||
Median RFS (months; 95% CI) | 14.8 (11.5-29.3) | 37.4 (32.1-NA) | .002 |
Conclusions
This study suggests that AM patients treated with adjuvant anti-PD-1 have shorter RFS than CM patients receiving the same treatment. Longer follow-up is needed to investigate overall survival and distant-metastasis-free survival.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
J.B.A.G. Haanen: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Bristol Myers Squibb, Achilles Therapeutics, Ipsen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck Serono, Pfizer, Molecular Partners, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Third Rock Venture, Iovance Biotherapeutics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board, SAB member: BioNTech, Immunocore, Gadeta, Instil Bio, PokeAcel, T-Knife; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, SAB member: Neogene Therapeutics, Scenic; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Neogene Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Bristol Myers Squibb, BioNTech US, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Amgen, Novartis, Asher Bio; Non-Financial Interests, Member: ASCO, AACR, SITC; Other, Other, Editorial Board ESMO Open: ESMO; Other, Other, Editor-in-Chief IOTECH: ESMO; Other, Editorial Board: Kidney Cancer. C.U. Blank: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, GSK, AZ, Pfizer, Lilly, GenMab, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Third Rock Ventures; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Immagene; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares, intention to develop IFN signature algorithm: NewCo, no name yet; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: BMS, Novartis, NanoString, 4SC; Other, pending patent: WO 2021/177822 A1. M.J.B. Aarts: Financial Interests, Advisory Board: Amgen, BMS, Novartis, MSD-Merck, Merck-Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Astellas, Bayer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Merck-Pfizer. J.W. de Groot: Financial Interests, Advisory Role: BMS, Pierre Fabre, Servier, MSD, Novartis. G.A.P. Hospers: Financial Interests, Advisory Role: Amgen, BMS, Roche, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: BMS, Seerave. E. Kapiteijn: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Merck, Delcath, Bayer, Lilly; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: BMS, Pierre Fabre, Delcath. R.S. van Rijn: Financial Interests, Advisory Board: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Other, expert meeting fee: Roche. A.A.M. Van der Veldt: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Role: BMS, Roche, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Sanofi, Ipsen, Eisai, Merck; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: MSD. M.J. Boers-Sonderen: Financial Interests, Advisory Role: Pierre Fabre, MSD, Novartis. F. Van Den Eertwegh: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Grant for national trial: Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Grant for research project: BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Research grant for trial: Sanofi, Idera; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Grant for trial: Teva; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role: BMS, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, MSD, Pfizer, Amgen, Ipsen, Merck. K.P.M. Suijkerbuijk: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Novartis, BMS, AbbVie, Pierre Fabre, MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Novartis, TigaTx. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
921P - HB-200 arenavirus-based immunotherapy plus pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment of patients with recurrent/metastatic HPV16 positive head and neck cancer
Presenter: Lisle Nabell
Session: Poster session 12
922P - Dose expansion results of the bifunctional EGFR/TGFβ inhibitor BCA101 with pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent, metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Glenn Hanna
Session: Poster session 12
923P - Phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of pembrolizumab combined with vorinostat in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head & neck squamous cell carcinoma – subgroup analysis of the PEVOsq basket trial
Presenter: Christophe Le Tourneau
Session: Poster session 12
924P - Polyfunctional HPV16-Specific T cell responses in subjects receiving PDS0101 and pembrolizumab combination treatment for recurrent/metastatic HPV16-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)
Presenter: Kevin Harrington
Session: Poster session 12
925P - Treatment discontinuation of immune checkpoint blockade in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma experiencing complete or nearly complete remission
Presenter: Konrad Klinghammer
Session: Poster session 12
926P - UK national real-world outcome data of first-line pembrolizumab treatment in head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC)
Presenter: Ifigenia Vasiliadou
Session: Poster session 12
927P - Patients (pts) with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) treated with nivolumab (NIVO) in the first-line (1L) or later-line (2L+) settings in Germany: Updated results from the real-world HANNA study
Presenter: Boris Kubuschok
Session: Poster session 12
928P - Prognostic value of body composition and nutritional assessment in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (R/M SCCHN) treated with immunotherapy (IO)
Presenter: Zara Vidales Sepulveda
Session: Poster session 12
930P - Platinum and taxane (PT) plus immunotherapy versus immunotherapy alone in patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck cancer (HNSCC)
Presenter: Marcelo Bonomi
Session: Poster session 12