Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 25

CN31 - A qualitative study investigating the perception of simultaneous care in nurses

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 25

Topics

Supportive and Palliative Care;  Psychosocial Aspects of Cancer

Tumour Site

Presenters

Daniela Tregnago

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S1229-S1256. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1321

Authors

D. Tregnago1, A. Avancini1, G. Polato1, L. Belluomini1, I. Trestini1, M. Sposito1, J. Insolda1, S. Vincenzi1, M. Milella2, S. Pilotto3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Engineering For Innovation Medicine, University of Verona, 37134 - Verona/IT
  • 2 Department Of Engineering For Innovation Medicine, Section Of Oncology, University of Verona, 37134 - Verona/IT
  • 3 Department Of Engineering For Innovation Medicine University Of Verona, Section of Oncology, 37100 - Verona/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract CN31

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate features that can influence the incorporation of simultaneous care in the oncological setting by nurses' perspectives.

Methods

A qualitative study, involving structured focus group discussions, was conducted via web conferences (ZOOM platform). A total of two focus groups were performed, involving 9 nurses. Each discussion was audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed with thematic analysis.

Results

According to the Health Belief Model, the transcripts of the focus groups were categorized into: (1) benefits, (2) barriers, and (3) cues to action. Nurses recognized the acquisition of greater awareness of the path of care, a sense of empowerment, and the improvement in the patient's quality of life as the major benefits of simultaneous care activation. The perceived barriers in the simultaneous care activation were related to an increased risk of anxiety levels in patients and their relatives, as well as the precarious culture and lack of knowledge among the public opinion. Different strategies may favor the early activation of simultaneous care, including: a teamwork approach (oncologists, palliativists, and nurses), correct patient education, and the synergy between cancer hospital healthcare professionals and home simultaneous care staff.

Conclusions

This result may help to better implement and activate simultaneous care in the oncological setting with important implications for the patients’ quality of life.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.