Abstract CN33
Background
Developments in cancer care have resulted in improved survival and quality of life. Integration of acute and palliative cancer care may be challenging, and there is no golden standard model for integration. Fragmented care is associated with sub-optimal communication, collaboration, and ineffective care. This may lead to unnecessary care transitions, and impact patient safety. We performed a study with the aim to explore how health care professionals, from both acute and palliative care, perceive clinical decision-making when caring for patients undergoing active cancer treatment in parallel with specialized palliative care at home.
Methods
Qualitative explorative design, using online focus-group interviews, based on patient-cases, among health care professionals (physicians and nurses) and Framework Analysis.
Results
Six online focus-group interviews were performed. Few signs of systematic integration between acute and palliative care teams were found, risking fragmented care and putting the patients in vulnerable situations. Different aspects of uncertainty related to mandates and goals-of-care impacted clinical decision-making. Organizational factors and uncertainty related to responsibilities impacted clinical decisions. We found barriers to timely end-of-life conversations and clinical decisions on optimal care. In addition, the appropriateness of transfer to acute care, seemed to be related to lack of knowing which team was responsible.
Conclusions
Lack of integration between acute and palliative care have negative consequences for patients (fragmented care), health care professionals (ethical stress), and the health care system (inadequate use of resources). Clinical implications: We started two main integration projects based on this study, one piloting direct admission to specialized palliative inpatient ward directly from the emergency room. The other on-going project will try digital visits with patient, the oncology, and the palliative team, aiming to discuss goals-of-care. The results and what we learned from those integration projects will be presented.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Regional Cancer center, Stockholm-Gotland, Sweden.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
CN9 - Communicating with patients in modern cancer care
Presenter: Alison Woods
Session: Poster session 25
Resources:
Abstract
CN10 - Development and usability test of an individualized nutrition management application (iNutrition) for post-discharged gastric cancer patients following gastrectomy
Presenter: Xiao-han Jiang
Session: Poster session 25
Resources:
Abstract
CN11 - Improving quality of life for patients with prostate cancer: ProstaGYM, a new digital skill
Presenter: Enrique Gallardo
Session: Poster session 25
Resources:
Abstract
CN12 - Integrating weekly symptom monitoring for patients with prostate cancer in radiation oncology: A prospective cohort study using electronic patient-reported outcomes
Presenter: Pia Møller
Session: Poster session 25
Resources:
Abstract
CN14 - Quality of the abeona health app according to the onco-haematology patient in the Principality of Andorra: Preliminary results
Presenter: Carlota de Miguel Barbero
Session: Poster session 25
Resources:
Abstract
CN15 - Real-life clinical and organizational evaluation of telemonitoring and assisted telemonitoring in more than 1500 cancer patients
Presenter: Sophie Martin
Session: Poster session 25
Resources:
Abstract
CN16 - The Mount Vernon Cancer Center non medical prescriber GI oncology clinic experience
Presenter: Melanie Blyth
Session: Poster session 25
Resources:
Abstract
CN17 - Use of the ONCO'nect telemonitoring tool by socially deprived outpatients actively treated for a solid cancer: A retrospective quantitative and qualitative analysis of the Re'connect program
Presenter: coralie BOITEAU
Session: Poster session 25
Resources:
Abstract
CN20 - Nurse’s role in coordinating new cancer screening initiatives: Experiences from an on-going risk-based lung cancer screening feasibility study, among Swedish women
Presenter: Nina Nordgren
Session: Poster session 25
Resources:
Abstract
CN21 - Stakeholder perceptions of cervical screening accessibility and attendance in Ireland: A qualitative study
Presenter: Sophie Mulcahy Symmons
Session: Poster session 25
Resources:
Abstract