Abstract 1609P
Background
Although accurate prognostication is very important to assist with patients with advanced cancer at the end-of-life (EOL), current prognostic models have several limitations. We aimed to develop a machine learning (ML)-based prognostic model to predict survival at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 2 months in patients with advanced cancer referred to palliative care specialists.
Methods
A total of 2,104 consecutive patients admitted to the acute palliate care unit (APCU) in a single tertiary cancer center between April 2015 and December 2019 were selected for analysis. Variables for developing the ML algorithm included age, gender, performance status, cancer type, body mass index, laboratory findings, and Edmonton Symptom Assessment System scores. Analysable patients (N=2,084) were divided into training set (N=1,667) and validation set (N=417), and the performance of the ML algorithm model was evaluated by accuracy, sensitivity, precision, specificity, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC).
Results
Among 2,084 patients, the median age was 67 years, 865 (41.5%) patients were female, and the most common cancer type was lung cancer (20.4%). As for the final performance of the ML algorithm, the ensemble model using gradient boosting, random forest, and logistic regression was the best in terms of AUROC and AUPRC. The AUROC and AUPRC for predicting 2-week, 1-month, and 2-month survival were 0.84, 0.79, 0.79, and 0.66, 0.77, 0.92, respectively. Because our data cannot reflect all characteristics of patients with imminent death, AUPRC was relatively low in 2-week mortality model. More precise results could be obtained by deep learning with multilayer perceptron using soft labelling (AUPRC 0.90).
Conclusions
Our study demonstrated ML-based prognostic models capable of predicting short-term survival of 2 weeks, 1 month, and 2 months in patients with advanced cancer admitted to an APCU. Integrating these models in the real-world may help patients nearing the EOL to make timely clinical and personal decisions.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1867P - A cross-sectional examination of information disclosure and health literacy amongst patients with lymphoma
Presenter: Steve Kalloger
Session: Poster session 05
1868P - Challenges for shared decision making in incurable cancer, with a focus on health literacy
Presenter: Chloe Holden
Session: Poster session 05
1871P - The PainRELife ecosystem: A new aid for improving clinical care and shared decision-making in breast cancer patients with chronic pain
Presenter: Marianna Masiero
Session: Poster session 05
1872P - Financial distress of a cancer disease in Germany: A new patient reported outcome measure (PROM) and first results from a bi-centered cross-sectional analysis
Presenter: Sophie Pauge
Session: Poster session 05
1873P - Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms and self-care behaviours: Preliminary data of a cross-sectional study
Presenter: Valentina Biagioli
Session: Poster session 05
1874P - Beliefs about chemotherapy in Tunisian patients newly diagnosed with cancer
Presenter: Hadhemi Ayadi
Session: Poster session 05
1875P - Behind the use of ChatGPT for oncological purposes: Fears and challenges
Presenter: Ilaria Durosini
Session: Poster session 05
1876P - Cancer stigma: How Tunisian patients perceive their cancer
Presenter: sofiene Fendri
Session: Poster session 05
1877P - Meaning-making in the re-entry phase: A qualitative focus group study with patients with breast cancer and melanoma
Presenter: Anna Visser
Session: Poster session 05