Abstract 1609P
Background
Although accurate prognostication is very important to assist with patients with advanced cancer at the end-of-life (EOL), current prognostic models have several limitations. We aimed to develop a machine learning (ML)-based prognostic model to predict survival at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 2 months in patients with advanced cancer referred to palliative care specialists.
Methods
A total of 2,104 consecutive patients admitted to the acute palliate care unit (APCU) in a single tertiary cancer center between April 2015 and December 2019 were selected for analysis. Variables for developing the ML algorithm included age, gender, performance status, cancer type, body mass index, laboratory findings, and Edmonton Symptom Assessment System scores. Analysable patients (N=2,084) were divided into training set (N=1,667) and validation set (N=417), and the performance of the ML algorithm model was evaluated by accuracy, sensitivity, precision, specificity, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC).
Results
Among 2,084 patients, the median age was 67 years, 865 (41.5%) patients were female, and the most common cancer type was lung cancer (20.4%). As for the final performance of the ML algorithm, the ensemble model using gradient boosting, random forest, and logistic regression was the best in terms of AUROC and AUPRC. The AUROC and AUPRC for predicting 2-week, 1-month, and 2-month survival were 0.84, 0.79, 0.79, and 0.66, 0.77, 0.92, respectively. Because our data cannot reflect all characteristics of patients with imminent death, AUPRC was relatively low in 2-week mortality model. More precise results could be obtained by deep learning with multilayer perceptron using soft labelling (AUPRC 0.90).
Conclusions
Our study demonstrated ML-based prognostic models capable of predicting short-term survival of 2 weeks, 1 month, and 2 months in patients with advanced cancer admitted to an APCU. Integrating these models in the real-world may help patients nearing the EOL to make timely clinical and personal decisions.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1594P - End-of-life hospital cancer care in the COVID-19 era: A retrospective population-based study in the Netherlands
Presenter: Ellis Slotman
Session: Poster session 05
1595P - Incidence and characterization of end-of-life (EoL) systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) in melanoma patients (pts): A monocentric experience
Presenter: Silvia Buriolla
Session: Poster session 05
1596P - Exploring the economic impact of palliative care in oncology at the end of life
Presenter: Sarah Gomes
Session: Poster session 05
1597P - Improving in-hospital end-of-life care (EOLC) for oncology patients in a tertiary cancer centre
Presenter: Conor Moloney
Session: Poster session 05
1598P - Differences in referral patterns to the palliative care team among specialized physicians in patients with terminal cancer
Presenter: Hyun Jeong Shim
Session: Poster session 05
1599P - Clinical predictors of 30-day mortality in hospitalized patients with lung cancer: A retrospective single-center observational study
Presenter: Alessandro Leonetti
Session: Poster session 05
1600P - Sarcopenia, depression, and poor health perception among cancer patients registered in an oncology center in Pakistan
Presenter: Sobia Yaqub
Session: Poster session 05
1601P - Relationship between CT and ultrasonography-based sarcopenia and hematologic toxicity in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy
Presenter: Gurkan Guner
Session: Poster session 05
1602P - Simulation training for compassionate extubation in the pediatric intensive care unit
Presenter: Nicole Fernandez
Session: Poster session 05
1603P - The ability of the LACE index to predict 30-day readmissions in oncology patients
Presenter: Burcu Ulas Kahya
Session: Poster session 05