Abstract 1609P
Background
Although accurate prognostication is very important to assist with patients with advanced cancer at the end-of-life (EOL), current prognostic models have several limitations. We aimed to develop a machine learning (ML)-based prognostic model to predict survival at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 2 months in patients with advanced cancer referred to palliative care specialists.
Methods
A total of 2,104 consecutive patients admitted to the acute palliate care unit (APCU) in a single tertiary cancer center between April 2015 and December 2019 were selected for analysis. Variables for developing the ML algorithm included age, gender, performance status, cancer type, body mass index, laboratory findings, and Edmonton Symptom Assessment System scores. Analysable patients (N=2,084) were divided into training set (N=1,667) and validation set (N=417), and the performance of the ML algorithm model was evaluated by accuracy, sensitivity, precision, specificity, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC).
Results
Among 2,084 patients, the median age was 67 years, 865 (41.5%) patients were female, and the most common cancer type was lung cancer (20.4%). As for the final performance of the ML algorithm, the ensemble model using gradient boosting, random forest, and logistic regression was the best in terms of AUROC and AUPRC. The AUROC and AUPRC for predicting 2-week, 1-month, and 2-month survival were 0.84, 0.79, 0.79, and 0.66, 0.77, 0.92, respectively. Because our data cannot reflect all characteristics of patients with imminent death, AUPRC was relatively low in 2-week mortality model. More precise results could be obtained by deep learning with multilayer perceptron using soft labelling (AUPRC 0.90).
Conclusions
Our study demonstrated ML-based prognostic models capable of predicting short-term survival of 2 weeks, 1 month, and 2 months in patients with advanced cancer admitted to an APCU. Integrating these models in the real-world may help patients nearing the EOL to make timely clinical and personal decisions.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1604P - A comparative study of symptom prevalence between adults and elderly patients with advanced cancer diagnosis under palliative care: A single institution experience
Presenter: Hodan Abdullah
Session: Poster session 05
1605P - The impact of cancer pain on survival of lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Sichao Wang
Session: Poster session 05
1606P - Sarcopenia, depression, and modes of feeding among cancer patients
Presenter: Muhammad Khokhar
Session: Poster session 05
1607P - Patient perceptions of the efficacy, safety, and quality of the evidence available on medicinal cannabis: A survey of Australian cancer patients - comparing users to non-users
Presenter: Joseph Taylor
Session: Poster session 05
1608P - Albumin-myosteatosis gauge as a prognostic factor in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing first-line chemotherapy
Presenter: Omer Dizdar
Session: Poster session 05
1610P - A new updated prognostic index for patients with brain metastases (BM) treated with palliative whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in the era of precision oncology: METASNCore project
Presenter: Pablo Flores Paco
Session: Poster session 05
1611P - Family carers’ experiences with brain metastases: A longitudinal qualitative study
Presenter: Tonje Lundeby
Session: Poster session 05
1612P - Demonstrating the complexity of need and the effectiveness of integrated palliative care: An analysis of routinely collected patient centred outcome measures
Presenter: Joanne Hayes
Session: Poster session 05
1613P - The BreakThrough cancer malnutrition
Presenter: Stefano De Santis
Session: Poster session 05
1614P - Integrated palliative care for patients referred for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy: A service evaluation
Presenter: Rebekah Williams
Session: Poster session 05