Abstract 3615
Background
As primary cutaneous melanoma patients with a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN, stage III) are now considered candidates for adjuvant systemic therapy, a SLN biopsy (SLNB) is indicated in more patients. However, SLNB is an invasive procedure and is negative in approximately 80% of patients. Therefore, there is a need for a non-invasive test to accurately identify patients with primary cutaneous melanoma without nodal metastases. Here we describe the first independent validation of a recently developed CP-GEP model to predict nodal metastasis. This risk model combines Breslow thickness, age, and gene expression variables from the primary melanoma.
Methods
This study focused on all patients >18 years who underwent a SLNB at the Erasmus Medical Center (between January 2007 and December 2017), within 90 days after diagnosis of primary cutaneous melanoma. Total RNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) primary cutaneous melanomas, reversed transcribed into cDNA and subsequently analyzed for the expression of 8 target genes involved in melanoma metastasis (ITGB3, PLAT, SERPINE2, GDF15, TGFBR1, LOXL4, IL8, MLANA) using an optimized qPCR protocol.
Results
FFPE tissue samples from 211 patients were analyzed using the CP-GEP model. At diagnosis, the median age was 55 years (interquartile range [IQR] 45-65), and the median Breslow thickness was 2.1mm (IQR 1.4-3.4). Most patients presented with a T2 or T3 melanoma, accounting for 94 and 70 patients, respectively. Overall, 27.5% of patients had a positive SLN. The CP-GEP model had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 89.4%. In patients with stage T1-T2 melanoma, the model was able to achieve an SLNB reduction rate of 40.1% with an NPV of 90.7%.
Conclusions
The CP-GEP model is a non-invasive and validated tool that is able to predict nodal metastasis in an independent Dutch population. Consequently, this risk model is able to accurately identify patients with primary cutaneous melanoma that can safely forego SLNB. Therefore, the CP-GEP model is a promising tool for patient care, preventing unnecessary surgery in the majority of patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Dermatology.
Funding
SkylineDx.
Disclosure
J.T. Dwarkasing: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: SkylineDx BV. D. Tempel: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: SkylineDx BV. L. Bosman: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: SkylineDx. A.A.M. Van der Veldt: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3973 - A randomized phase II study on the OPTimization of IMmunotherapy in squamous carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) – OPTIM (AIO-KHT-0117)
Presenter: Viktor Grünwald
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3489 - Overall Survival (OS) and Metastasis-Free Survival (MFS) in men with Biochemically Relapsed (BCR) Prostate Cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP) managed with deferred Androgen Deprivation Treatment (ADT): A combined Johns Hopkins and CPDR study
Presenter: Catherine Marshall
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4606 - ARCHES – the role of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with enzalutamide (ENZA) or placebo (PBO) in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC): Post hoc analyses of high and low disease volume and risk groups
Presenter: Arnulf Stenzl
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2975 - Updated survival analyses of a multicentric phase II randomized trial of docetaxel (D) plus enzalutamide (E) versus docetaxel (D) as first line chemotherapy for patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) (CHEIRON study).
Presenter: Orazio Caffo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2708 - Real-world analysis of patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving vs not receiving chemotherapy in the treatment sequence
Presenter: Alicia Morgans
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2134 - Baseline fracture risk in men with prostate cancer starting the STAMPEDE trial
Presenter: Janet Brown
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3504 - Risk of falls and fractures in patients with castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) treated with new hormonal agents – a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Presenter: Rodrigo Coutinho Mariano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2342 - Pain progression at initiation of chemotherapy in metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) is associated with a poor prognosis: a post-hoc analysis of FIRSTANA
Presenter: Nicolas Delanoy
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5331 - Pain evaluation in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with radium-223 (Ra-223) in the PARABO observation study
Presenter: Holger Palmedo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2823 - Time to castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and the risk of developing immune disorders
Presenter: Vincenza Conteduca
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract