Abstract 3615
Background
As primary cutaneous melanoma patients with a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN, stage III) are now considered candidates for adjuvant systemic therapy, a SLN biopsy (SLNB) is indicated in more patients. However, SLNB is an invasive procedure and is negative in approximately 80% of patients. Therefore, there is a need for a non-invasive test to accurately identify patients with primary cutaneous melanoma without nodal metastases. Here we describe the first independent validation of a recently developed CP-GEP model to predict nodal metastasis. This risk model combines Breslow thickness, age, and gene expression variables from the primary melanoma.
Methods
This study focused on all patients >18 years who underwent a SLNB at the Erasmus Medical Center (between January 2007 and December 2017), within 90 days after diagnosis of primary cutaneous melanoma. Total RNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) primary cutaneous melanomas, reversed transcribed into cDNA and subsequently analyzed for the expression of 8 target genes involved in melanoma metastasis (ITGB3, PLAT, SERPINE2, GDF15, TGFBR1, LOXL4, IL8, MLANA) using an optimized qPCR protocol.
Results
FFPE tissue samples from 211 patients were analyzed using the CP-GEP model. At diagnosis, the median age was 55 years (interquartile range [IQR] 45-65), and the median Breslow thickness was 2.1mm (IQR 1.4-3.4). Most patients presented with a T2 or T3 melanoma, accounting for 94 and 70 patients, respectively. Overall, 27.5% of patients had a positive SLN. The CP-GEP model had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 89.4%. In patients with stage T1-T2 melanoma, the model was able to achieve an SLNB reduction rate of 40.1% with an NPV of 90.7%.
Conclusions
The CP-GEP model is a non-invasive and validated tool that is able to predict nodal metastasis in an independent Dutch population. Consequently, this risk model is able to accurately identify patients with primary cutaneous melanoma that can safely forego SLNB. Therefore, the CP-GEP model is a promising tool for patient care, preventing unnecessary surgery in the majority of patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Dermatology.
Funding
SkylineDx.
Disclosure
J.T. Dwarkasing: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: SkylineDx BV. D. Tempel: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: SkylineDx BV. L. Bosman: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: SkylineDx. A.A.M. Van der Veldt: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5520 - Patient’s Usability Test results of a CINV Diary Application For Smartphones
Presenter: Paz Fernandez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2323 - Colorectal Telephone Assessment Pathway (CTAP) - A viable means of shortening time to a definitive diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
Presenter: Harriet Watson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6119 - Cancer Nursing and Social Media: Capturing the Zeitgeist
Presenter: Mark Foulkes
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1776 - Examination of mobile applications on breast cancer
Presenter: AYDANUR AYDIN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4128 - E-health effectiveness to increase patient adherence for immunotherapy; a cost-benefit study.
Presenter: Maria José Dias
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3219 - Experiences of internet-based stepped care among individuals with recently diagnosed cancer and symptoms of anxiety and/or depression
Presenter: Anna Hauffman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5010 - What do cancer patients know about their immunotherapy treatment?
Presenter: Mónica Arellano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4503 - Prospective Comparison of Travel Burden, Cost and Time to Obtain Tumor Board Treatment Plan Through In-Person Visits vs. an AI Enabled Health Technology (N=1803)
Presenter: Rajendra Badwe
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4123 - Cancer care through the fire and flames: 3-year experience in the utilisation of electronic consultation and referral system at the Red Zone in Southern Thailand
Presenter: Nanthiya Rattanakhot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2087 - The effect of e-mobile education on the quality of life in women with breast cancer
Presenter: Derya ÇInar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract