Abstract 4836
Background
Lung cancer patients with activating EGFR mutations tend to respond poorly to IO, but this is not true for all activating mutation driven lung cancers. Recent data show that patients with BRAF mutations tend to respond better to IO. Our study estimated the tumor neoantigen burden in these tumors, and the likelihood of their presentation to cytotoxic T cells by estimating their binding affinity to major histocompatibility complex (MHC).
Methods
Whole exome data for 68 patients with EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinoma and 33 with BRAF mutations were extracted from the Cancer Genome Atlas. MAFTOOLs was used to determine the tumor mutational load. Nonamers were estimated by simulating possible nonamer neoantigens from MAF files. The neoantigen (MT) and wildtype (WT) binding affinities to MHC-I were calculated using the NetMHC 4.0 server. The differential binding affinity of the neoantigens in comparison to wildtype was calculated as mean differential agretopicity index (DAI) = WT - MT. Patient survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results
Patients with mutated BRAF had higher median mutational burden (445, range 165-776) than those with EGFR mutations (90.5, range 60.5-219.5, p = 0.001). The median number of simulated neoantigens was higher in the BRAF (9536.5, range 3839.5-14626.0) vs the EGFR group (1895.5, range 1148.5-4766.5, p < 0.001). Mean DAI for BRAF and EGFR patients were 1046 and 1033, respectively, p = 0.86. In the BRAF mutant group, patients with DAI < 1,000 had significantly better 5-year survival (80% vs 40%, p = 0.022) compared to patients with DAI > 1,000. No such survival benefit was identified in the EGFR mutant group (56% vs 58%, p = 0.81).
Conclusions
BRAF mutant lung cancers are characterized by higher neoantigen burden, but their neoantigen differential binding affinity to MHC-I complex was not different from EGFR mutant lung cancers. Our analysis suggests that the improved response to IO in the BRAF mutant population is due to increased quantity in neoantigen burden and not a qualitative difference in MHC-I binding. Further, DAI had a prognostic impact in the BRAF population suggesting that it may be a measure of tumor neoantigen immunogenicity.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
J. Subramanian: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Paradigm; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Biocept. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5678 - Nanomaterials Augmented LDI-TOF-MS for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis and Classification
Presenter: Jian Zhou
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2436 - Development and Validation of an RNA-Seq Assay for Gene Fusions Detection in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Samples
Presenter: Hua Dong
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5271 - A Pilot Study to Implement an Artificial Intelligence (AI) System for Gastrointestinal Cancer Clinical Trial Matching
Presenter: Zhaohui Jin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4787 - A Blinded Comparison of Patient Treatments to Therapeutic Options Presented by an Artificial Intelligence-based Clinical Decision-support system
Presenter: Suthida Suwanvecho
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5744 - OncOS: scalable and accurate next-generation sequencing analytics for precision oncology and personalized patient care
Presenter: Joe Thompson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3752 - The association between wearable device physical activity metrics and performance status in oncology: a systematic review
Presenter: Milan Kos
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5820 - SomaticNET: neural network evaluation of somatic mutations in cancer
Presenter: Geoffroy Dubourg-Felonneau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4771 - Is there a role for Next-generation sequencing (NGS) profiling on metastatic non-colorectal gastrointestinal carcinomas (MNCGIC) in developing countries? A single center experience.
Presenter: Mauricio Ribeiro
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1209 - Metastatic Cancer Whole-Exome Sequencing in daily practice
Presenter: Manon Réda
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5702 - Genomic-Guided Individualized Precision Therapy in Refractory Metastatic Solid Tumor Patients with Extensively Poor Performance Status: A Chinese single institutional prospective observational real-world study
Presenter: Haitao Wang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract