Abstract 3752
Background
The expanding armamentarium of wearable devices offers new opportunities to supplement physician-assessed performance status (PS) with continuously acquired real-life patient data. It is relevant to identify and characterize the level of association between wearable device physical activity (PA) metrics and PS in cancer patients as a first step into evaluating their potential combined utility in evaluating treatment outcomes and clinical decisions. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to examine the association between wearable device PA metrics and PS in cancer patients.
Methods
We searched PubMed and EMBASE for studies that were conducted among adults with cancer, quantitatively assessed a relation between wearable device PA metrics and PS, and had a full text available in English. We extracted information on study design and population, wearable device type and PA metrics, outcome definitions, and results. Included studies were subjected to methodological quality assessment.
Results
Nine studies with a total of 574 patients were included in this review. Eight studies had a prospective observational study design and all studies reported on a different combination of wearable device PA metrics including: steps per day (n = 5), sedentary behavior (n = 5), and PA volume/intensity (n = 4). Much heterogeneity was observed regarding study population, wearable devices used, and reporting of results. None of the studies could be defined to be of ‘high methodological quality’ (≥ 70%): mean methodological quality was 47% and ranged from 40-60%. We found moderate evidence for a positive association between steps per day and PS, and for a negative association between sedentary behavior and PS.
Conclusions
Much heterogeneity was identified between studies with regards to study population, reported PA metrics, and used devices. Nevertheless, results of this study indicate that higher daily step count is associated with better PS in cancer patients. Whereas sedentary behavior is associated with worse PS. The next step into determining their potential combined utility in evaluating treatment outcomes and clinical decisions is to investigate the association between wearable device PA metrics and cancer outcomes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
H.W. Wilmink: Advisory / Consultancy: Shire; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Servier; Research grant / Funding (institution): Halozyme; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck. H.W.M. van Laarhoven: Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Nordic; Research grant / Funding (institution): Philips. M. van Oijen: Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Servier; Research grant / Funding (institution): Nordic; Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3524 - Cabazitaxel For Octogenarian Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (MCRPC).
Presenter: Paolo Tralongo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5637 - External Validation of a Prognostic Score in First-Line Metastastic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: David Lorente
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3228 - Treatment outcomes of 3rd treatment in a real-world metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) population: results from the Dutch CAPRI-registry
Presenter: Jessica Notohardjo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4695 - Pelvic lymph node dissection and its extent on survival benefit in prostate cancer patients with a risk of lymph node invasion>5%: a propensity score matching analysis from SEER database
Presenter: Junru Chen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4438 - Multi-institutional evaluation of therapeutic management for oligometastatic cancer prostate recurrence with choline-PET/CT
Presenter: Morgane Guibert-broudic
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4574 - Safety of new androgen receptor inhibitors (ARi) in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC): a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT)
Presenter: Amelia Altavilla
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3816 - Real-world use of radium-223 for treatment of metastatic castration resistant-prostate cancer (mCRPC): results from the Dutch CAPRI registry
Presenter: Malou Kuppen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5180 - A phase 2a study of radium-223 dichloride (Ra-223) alone or in combination with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Daniel Petrylak
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1067 - Adding ADT to PSMA-PET/CT-guided SBRT for oligometastatic prostate cancer improves distant progression-free survival
Presenter: Carole Mercier
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5529 - Safety and efficacy of Ac-225-PSMA-617 in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after failure of Lu-177-PSMA
Presenter: Robert Tauber
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract