Abstract 3228
Background
Data on outcomes of a 3rd line life prolonging drug (LPD) in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is lacking. Aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of a 3rd LPD in a real-world cohort of mCRPC patients.
Methods
mCRPC patients with a 3rd LPD before July 1st 2017 were retrospectively identified from the Dutch Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Registry (CAPRI) and followed to December 31st 2017. Outcomes were overall survival (OS), treatment duration (TD) and PSA response. The association of potential risk factors with death was tested by Cox proportional-hazard models after multiple imputation of missing baseline characteristics.
Results
We identified 602 patients treated with a 3rd LPD. Baseline characteristics are listed in the table. Median OS was 7.8 mo (IQR 4.4-14.0), median TD was 3.2 mo (IQR 1.9-4.7) and PSA response (≥ 50% decline) was observed in 131 patients (22%). ECOG PS of 1 and >1 (HR 1.48, p < 0.01 and HR 1.75, p < 0.01, respectively), opioid use (HR 1.51, p < 0.01), symptoms (HR 1.50, p = 0.04), visceral metastases (HR 2.11, p < 0.01), PSA ≥170 ug/l (HR 1.32, p < 0.01), alkaline phosphatase ≥150 U/l (HR 1.66, p < 0.01) and time from CRPC to start 3rd LPD <24 mo (HR 1.56, p < 0.01) were related to shorter survival in multivariable analysis. Patients were categorized into low (0-1 point, n = 81), low-intermediate (2-3 points, n = 262), high-intermediate (4-5 points, n = 208) and high risk (6-7 points, n = 51) prognosis groups based on the number of prognostic factors and their regressions coefficients. These groups had a median OS of 20.4, 11.0, 6.6 and 3.9 mo, with a median TD of 4.6, 3.4, 2.6 and 1.9 mo, respectively (p < 0.01).Table:
865P Baseline characteristics at start of a 3rd line line prolonging drug (LPD) treatment
Characteristics | 3rd LPD n = 602 | Missings n(%) |
---|---|---|
Age (years) a | 71.1 ± 7.4 | 0 |
Time from CRPC to start treatment (months) b | 24.6 (16.7-34.1) | 0 |
Time from castration to CRPC (months) b | 13.0 (7.8-23.2) | 0 |
ECOG PS | 132 (21.9) | |
- 0 | 103 (17.1) | |
- 1 | 278 (46.2) | |
->1 | 89 (14.8) | |
Opioid use c | 153 (25.4) | 66 (11.0) |
Symptomatic c | 466 (77.4) | 50 (8.3) |
Metastatic site c | ||
- Bone | 536 (89.0) | 46 (7.6) |
- Visceral | 102 (16.9) | 260 (43.1) |
- Lymphnode | 263 (43.7) | 208 (43.5) |
Hemoglobin (mmol/l) a | 7.2 ± 1.1 | 54 (9.0) |
Platelets (109/L) b | 253 (199.0-320.7) | 62 (10.3) |
Prostate-specific antigen (ug/l) b | 170 (60.9-470.5) | 37 (6.1) |
Alkaline phosphatase (U/l) b | 153 (90.5-301.0) | 61 (10.1) |
Lactate dehydrogenase (U/l) b | 261 (207.5-383.0) | 144 (23.9) |
3rd line LPD treatment c | ||
- Abiraterone acetate | 137 (22.8) | 0 |
- Enzalutamide | 129 (21.4) | 0 |
- Docetaxel | 45 (7.5) | 0 |
- Cabazitaxel | 213 (35.4) | 0 |
- Radium-223-chloride | 78 (13.0) | 0 |
Note: Data are defined as amean ± SD, bmedian (IQR) or cnumber of patients (%). Abbreviations: CRPC; Castration-resistant prostate Cancer, ECOG PS;
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score.
Conclusions
Our results show that the efficacy of a 3rd LPD in mCRPC patients was limited compared to pivotal trials of 1st and 2nd line. We used a simple prognostic model to identify mCRPC patients that can benefit from a 3rd LPD.
Clinical trial identification
NL3440 (NTR3591).
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Funding
Sanofi-Aventis Netherlands B.V., Janssen-Cilag B.V., Astellas Pharma B.V., Bayer B.V.
Disclosure
M.C.P. Kuppen: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen. H.M. Westgeest: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen; Honoraria (self): Roche. A.J.M. van den Eertwegh: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD Oncology; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck. J. Van Moorselaar: Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi-Genzyme. N. Mehra: Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Honoraria (self): Merck; Honoraria (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): MSD. J.L. Coenen: Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi. I. van Oort: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Mdx Health; Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas. D.M. Somford: Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas. R. de Wit: Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Sharp&Dohme; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche/ Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Clivis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Lilly. A.M. Bergman: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Janssen. C. Uyl-de Groot: Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen-Cilag; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Genzyme; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Glycostem Therapeutics; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck. W.R. Gerritsen: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bayer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bavarian Nordic; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Janssen-Cilag; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Morphosys; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy, Ad hoc Consultancy: Aglaia Biomedical Ventures; Advisory / Consultancy, Ad hoc Consultancy: Psioxus Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy: Curvevac; Advisory / Consultancy: Dendreon. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5520 - Patient’s Usability Test results of a CINV Diary Application For Smartphones
Presenter: Paz Fernandez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2323 - Colorectal Telephone Assessment Pathway (CTAP) - A viable means of shortening time to a definitive diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
Presenter: Harriet Watson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6119 - Cancer Nursing and Social Media: Capturing the Zeitgeist
Presenter: Mark Foulkes
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1776 - Examination of mobile applications on breast cancer
Presenter: AYDANUR AYDIN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4128 - E-health effectiveness to increase patient adherence for immunotherapy; a cost-benefit study.
Presenter: Maria José Dias
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3219 - Experiences of internet-based stepped care among individuals with recently diagnosed cancer and symptoms of anxiety and/or depression
Presenter: Anna Hauffman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5010 - What do cancer patients know about their immunotherapy treatment?
Presenter: Mónica Arellano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4503 - Prospective Comparison of Travel Burden, Cost and Time to Obtain Tumor Board Treatment Plan Through In-Person Visits vs. an AI Enabled Health Technology (N=1803)
Presenter: Rajendra Badwe
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4123 - Cancer care through the fire and flames: 3-year experience in the utilisation of electronic consultation and referral system at the Red Zone in Southern Thailand
Presenter: Nanthiya Rattanakhot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2087 - The effect of e-mobile education on the quality of life in women with breast cancer
Presenter: Derya ÇInar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract